Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufs: Probe for temperature notification support
To:     Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
References: <20210901123707.5014-1-avri.altman@wdc.com>
 <20210901123707.5014-2-avri.altman@wdc.com>
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Message-ID: <035fad25-1b0d-c8ba-896f-eae2bd2144e3@acm.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:35:18 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210901123707.5014-2-avri.altman@wdc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 9/1/21 5:37 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return hba->dev_info.high_temp_notif;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_low_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return hba->dev_info.low_temp_notif;
> +}

Please do not introduce single line inline functions.

> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_temp_notif_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(hba) ||
> +	       ufshcd_is_high_temp_notif_allowed(hba);
> +}

Since this function is not in any hot path (command processing), 
shouldn't it be moved into ufshcd.c?

Thanks,

Bart.