Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp945816pxb; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 13:23:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYZnPdbRqnkOhLpav6GGuRAi35KRcx9BvokoaZHZTd3LOCQu6kB1KGMEz0rdkr/f+cUt0T X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9693:: with SMTP id m19mr1089095ion.181.1630527801168; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:23:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630527801; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pjRXAXOpolDHx0CqMRddZCkvMhjfWU8TVHFzHSgtxCKf+SfOWxVjy4ay0Ik5mj2CYp E70bXJUeI/JZUdNqXnHiVUcbjNcuW14ZyA5xhcuF4xgKWyH3EAwMjI5o8yYu7jAvpz7i 9gCyuyUJaZcJmsjF3Yl3G0/aXi4Vor8X+eLGQk81xhCixs7CvTz5ZMczyLa3lXJ5kSKi lWqLGlrSHbdSmPJVxYjEdrmK9vCHP2FUzlQVZ6ULva/ywVnhahsiX73+kGktZtRoQOlC SMewNofsYHtSZp2ag2asU4dsD5aYZ3AJs1MczxRU240qf9A9F70YjLL9UmJXtTZ3GKPK rfrA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=KOMwbR/9rrcQFWuafJynxLkaMDZnl4TQi3Qh9Kzxi28=; b=QKymJbAcf6WM8QEER9x1B+mROXRFlCBucNmEAJfDqfdV1ghOviZgp4a8W6EY0r03aG mvCcjg9Di2Z8yzpZm07XOGZt9YFwJ4lM/PZUN9pc8BuewXo/n4NQ7YnSIScbrOBrMVEl hXJy/LLKZayhGm//EU+tD/jeyhcf3lU3FzUlnnBEnKcWgNAbMvicA/y0m4Gh161okrFc xQrW/xqSCCoGrRdIBYyL5nSHACQt1d2a5ugb1p73mn6tPRUMyb1W9sKQGhRecWi+7ORU Fqxdsql8pAJzOOPCLYHuendRDGfz11duC8u8LWQyMEyRqBy8jsZRmjnlwFDKNLTHfCk0 MzJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ZnsrP5zq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u4si425377jak.106.2021.09.01.13.23.08; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ZnsrP5zq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344473AbhIATSb (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:18:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40806 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230232AbhIATSb (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:18:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15F46C061575; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id e7so266094plh.8; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:17:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KOMwbR/9rrcQFWuafJynxLkaMDZnl4TQi3Qh9Kzxi28=; b=ZnsrP5zqcYlGL2y0fi6Bn9h5YuAFufMEtnfTzAQ/bV8vROK7S53bVfJ3mt4pjqWIat iK8OnHso/UQijBImKAdqOoGOgKZGXatXMvh7MVCmor8wIV19yaFduBMSW+8mXcPYfEUv TSIIklb/sUx1ZOEig06bbzHOiOZhxXl01qaUKGgKoOoOV8Cy72baI8sBGKTGLY+2DNW3 0iHud9mQgSPLISrfw/pO9jnRV1L0/0yP5Ap1Jb8Vqi34f/zPxCpvHPnjhqMAU8X8EqHs 8TZsu9/7UC1tRzfIwp4CLLUaAkwbc5VHu/qrETs8niLOj6pONsEZM0fwWySN9cd2njFp JXMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KOMwbR/9rrcQFWuafJynxLkaMDZnl4TQi3Qh9Kzxi28=; b=GcF2RuspP1wHQ+kIWt1yOzNWxn7vMKcD8JsAejUi9pjXOt6ETHKItVh6yq1/Al4prP GJhxbgLmL5LGuPhZtYtO38wd3xHoi5aib1CYIcOZV7iazlU64YfomimilO5mVxqDgFB9 gaOBWMMCLGLO8od4sB9lbvHmyTJlqk9HyKW/zmIQ9s4kfa/HpB9uh+/eS7GD2J0vqBQ4 ne59ultL39IEVNtv6qn9agWsLvZN7nDG+esmPqz+vXBQSWXl/knWdYEmZQp3xry7/1Q0 bhiIGm/uGuU+asxcDyApT2Pu1d3eexLiCKnYWJW2EMAOp4jNG4Imhm+xVqsSE3rVy1Kh V+Jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hJmVzZUIHvQT3eOc0ppeCpGjXIcglLeckQmz7hbEr5ZD7LT0R L4Du0KgL3hQe8tjoChBC1B3H3beZsc0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd42:b0:138:d3ca:c387 with SMTP id b2-20020a170902bd4200b00138d3cac387mr975254plx.51.1630523853615; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:17:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.86.235] (c-73-241-150-58.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.241.150.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z131sm236830pfc.159.2021.09.01.12.17.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:17:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] skb_expand_head() adjust skb->truesize incorrectly To: Vasily Averin , Christoph Paasch , "David S. Miller" Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , netdev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@openvz.org, Alexey Kuznetsov , Julian Wiedmann References: From: Eric Dumazet Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:17:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/1/21 1:11 AM, Vasily Averin wrote: > Christoph Paasch reports [1] about incorrect skb->truesize > after skb_expand_head() call in ip6_xmit. > This may happen because of two reasons: > - skb_set_owner_w() for newly cloned skb is called too early, > before pskb_expand_head() where truesize is adjusted for (!skb-sk) case. > - pskb_expand_head() does not adjust truesize in (skb->sk) case. > In this case sk->sk_wmem_alloc should be adjusted too. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/20/1082 > > Fixes: f1260ff15a71 ("skbuff: introduce skb_expand_head()") > Reported-by: Christoph Paasch > Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin > --- > v4: decided to use is_skb_wmem() after pskb_expand_head() call > fixed 'return (EXPRESSION);' in os_skb_wmem according to Eric Dumazet > v3: removed __pskb_expand_head(), > added is_skb_wmem() helper for skb with wmem-compatible destructors > there are 2 ways to use it: > - before pskb_expand_head(), to create skb clones > - after successfull pskb_expand_head() to change owner on extended skb. > v2: based on patch version from Eric Dumazet, > added __pskb_expand_head() function, which can be forced > to adjust skb->truesize and sk->sk_wmem_alloc. > --- > include/net/sock.h | 1 + > net/core/skbuff.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > net/core/sock.c | 8 ++++++++ > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h > index 95b2577..173d58c 100644 > --- a/include/net/sock.h > +++ b/include/net/sock.h > @@ -1695,6 +1695,7 @@ struct sk_buff *sock_wmalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size, int force, > gfp_t priority); > void __sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb); > void sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb); > +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb); > struct sk_buff *sock_omalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size, > gfp_t priority); > void skb_orphan_partial(struct sk_buff *skb); > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c > index f931176..09991cb 100644 > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c > @@ -1804,28 +1804,45 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_realloc_headroom(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom) > struct sk_buff *skb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom) > { > int delta = headroom - skb_headroom(skb); > + int osize = skb_end_offset(skb); > + struct sk_buff *oskb = NULL; > + struct sock *sk = skb->sk; > > if (WARN_ONCE(delta <= 0, > "%s is expecting an increase in the headroom", __func__)) > return skb; > > - /* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared */ > + delta = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta); > + /* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared. > + * Also we should clone skb if its destructor does > + * not adjust skb->truesize and sk->sk_wmem_alloc > + */ > if (skb_shared(skb)) { > struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); > > - if (likely(nskb)) { > - if (skb->sk) > - skb_set_owner_w(nskb, skb->sk); > - consume_skb(skb); > - } else { > + if (unlikely(!nskb)) { > kfree_skb(skb); > + return NULL; > } > + oskb = skb; > skb = nskb; > } > - if (skb && > - pskb_expand_head(skb, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) { > + if (pskb_expand_head(skb, delta, 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) { > kfree_skb(skb); > - skb = NULL; > + kfree_skb(oskb); > + return NULL; > + } > + if (oskb) { > + if (sk) if (is_skb_wmem(oskb)) Again, it is not valid to call skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk) on all kind of sockets. > + skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk); > + consume_skb(oskb); > + } else if (sk) { && (skb->destructor != sock_edemux) (Because in this case , pskb_expand_head() already adjusted skb->truesize) > + delta = osize - skb_end_offset(skb); > + if (!is_skb_wmem(skb)) > + skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk); This is dangerous, even if a socket is there, its sk->sk_wmem_alloc could be zero. We can not add skb->truesize to a refcount_t that already reached 0 (sk_free()) If is_skb_wmem() is false, you probably should do nothing, and leave current destructor as it is. (skb->truesize can be adjusted without issue) > + skb->truesize += delta; > + if (sk_fullsock(sk)) if (is_skb_wmem(skb)) > + refcount_add(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); > } > return skb; > } > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > index 950f1e7..6cbda43 100644 > --- a/net/core/sock.c > +++ b/net/core/sock.c > @@ -2227,6 +2227,14 @@ void skb_set_owner_w(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_set_owner_w); > > +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb) > +{ > + return skb->destructor == sock_wfree || > + skb->destructor == __sock_wfree || > + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) && skb->destructor == tcp_wfree); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_skb_wmem); > + > static bool can_skb_orphan_partial(const struct sk_buff *skb) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE >