Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032312AbWLGPdM (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:33:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1032313AbWLGPdM (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:33:12 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:6319 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032312AbWLGPdK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:33:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HC4d7yvCgkX6Dg0QPCe5pxEL0HS+b4J65vd3xCr6j5zx4vrD16KaKIVfniaN2bvykL//ENphvBoVCjX+GOh4cDKuZ5pg8YHcao4TpDI6tcfYhyo9te0qXiq0mxUIQv1hqhWWkfr6+rKhqkJo/zIBRI9nRpDq2t6UPcuK++O9+sA= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:33:08 -0800 From: "Ulrich Drepper" To: "Andreas Schwab" Subject: Re: Linux should define ENOTSUP Cc: "Theodore Tso" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061206135134.GJ3927@implementation.labri.fr> <1165415115.3233.449.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061206143159.GP3927@implementation.labri.fr> <20061207134914.GB31773@thunk.org> <20061207141542.GD31773@thunk.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 917 Lines: 19 On 12/7/06, Andreas Schwab wrote: > The quoted sentence is not shaded as an XSI extension, thus it is part of > POSIX-1:2001. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. The change I pointed at was accepted to the interpretations track which means that if we would create a Technical Corrigendum 3 for the 2001 standard (which we are not) the relaxation for the error values would be added. The current situation is just as good, it's just as binding. There is no need to reissue the standard to make such changes. So, put this issue to rest. There is not issue. The whole premise for the original post is wrong these days. There is no compliance problem. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/