Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp4387pxb; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 20:04:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5L3tbXU4ua9eANg/u7bKWCCXvSOFJojRGGUS7msYcCyR2tzk53DmF1duyIFLNgkyYlaGV X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1b08:: with SMTP id o8mr1217259ejg.21.1630551843779; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:04:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630551843; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kRJxMFmCNZAmn0TKC+Vgv6pEe7gvuWXE3ZEAH30B1zqEyBHdab8DFhGNMYG6NTWKjc ELPU4S4Fqfj7hdQ7sSXFNWpcbJ20ilZSA44OFgKF+nam2IOuu6mzZzGL1O830E87PcYi AuFAoGGzjFCH1ycXOc3XQaxPVZOR1L+opKAOVel3NVxZRAhd33Ovq3HRG/kHvMLdaVEg kWtk4ZgzXXD9JKsbLQC5TUukrd2eTyUcUH9+mEKVL3r4KkYDq5+V/1CBG1MNeVDCeC6j kUnYsWNPKM/ut7G1HeRGYR4IdQGkrgN3yvj6992WpBaR1eIOwSdST6W+rJngKFrY08XL cqVQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=mq+GZt8S6a1Utc1dbJpsC+dfF9WHj5PRIDDg4dtoU+8=; b=rmt+X7tvlRAZqEHhXfZMyvz2gZKuaH7kJ3XIP8C54bZ3n9XCYMAsQEmtWQmkWudzD7 BTdBxrsLDNeT+DZd0tHyje+l/pdUon/DoirnUg3t4mNsr5aFXtzSb05lf4A/hP/k+VYK WgY6CJ/agRyIn0Tk4PSSYIimvvwixvc243ldwzL8bh4U9zRlaZsnuiOpd8GVwMBTLVbV haw4mCgu3ZHNXGlljoeg2BlilW6ZNue505EyIniX4G6Rfrm6ycCWr6KsgXPafGUdLeh+ VEzfiOhn01XvpirFLJlcverL6cCzF4ZF6ViCxtUXf29b0luD57yYxhVc1EK49I6buXq2 22bA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 6si603502eje.339.2021.09.01.20.03.37; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243152AbhIBCiO (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 22:38:14 -0400 Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.44]:38377 "EHLO out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233145AbhIBCiN (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 22:38:13 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R831e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04426;MF=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=8;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0Umym6tP_1630550233; Received: from testdeMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Umym6tP_1630550233) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:37:14 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "net: fix NULL pointer reference in cipso_v4_doi_free" To: Paul Moore Cc: "David S. Miller" , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <18f0171e-0cc8-6ae6-d04a-a69a2a3c1a39@linux.alibaba.com> <7f239a0e-7a09-3dc0-43ce-27c19c7a309d@linux.alibaba.com> <4c000115-4069-5277-ce82-946f2fdb790a@linux.alibaba.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:37:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/9/2 上午5:05, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:21 PM ηŽ‹θ΄‡ wrote: >> >> Hi Paul, it confused me since it's the first time I face >> such situation, but I just realized what you're asking is >> actually this revert, correct? > > I believe DaveM already answered your question in the other thread, > but if you are still unsure about the patch let me know. I do failed to get the point :-( As I checked the: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git both v1 and v2 are there with the same description and both code modification are applied. We want revert v1 but not in a revert patch style, then do you suggest send a normal patch to do the code revert? Regards, Michael Wang >