Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210822161005.22467-1-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
 <20210822161005.22467-4-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> <YSip4/kMNOG4uYC3@kroah.com>
 <CAMhs-H_0ytYCoBLj9GJDjHSPPHLC6_oBsm-V9s4FjhE7NY8TCw@mail.gmail.com> <YTCWR7oyLWgTDbQe@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <YTCWR7oyLWgTDbQe@kroah.com>
From:   Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Sep 2021 12:15:12 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMhs-H8U-crQHFVQj6j4Y5qs-S2NaW9trH8twKH8AwDR+AAYgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: mt7621-pci: set end limit for 'ioport_resource'
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        "open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:15 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 05:14:27PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:01 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 06:10:05PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > > > We have increase IO_SPACE_LIMIT for ralink platform to get PCI IO resources
> > > > properly handled using PCI core APIs. To align those changes with driver
> > > > code we have to set 'ioport_resource' end limit to IO_SPACE_LIMIT to avoid
> > > > errors.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> > Thanks. Since I am planning to move 'mt7621-pci' from staging to
> > 'drivers/pci/controller' and send v3 after the next merge window, I
> > prefer this patch to go through the staging tree. For the other two I
> > don't have any preference and it is ok for me to go through mips or
> > pci trees. So, Bjorn and Thomas is up to you if you are ok with the
> > changes.
>
> Yes, I would need acks for the other patches in the series if this is to
> come through the staging tree.

Yes, I know it. Let's wait for Thomas and Bjorn preference for those
remaining two.

Best regards,
    Sergio Paracuellos
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h