Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760768AbWLHQjj (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:39:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760771AbWLHQji (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:39:38 -0500 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:39076 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760768AbWLHQji (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:39:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:33:04 -0500 From: Jeff Dike To: Adrian Bunk Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: UML and fastcall/FASTCALL Message-ID: <20061208163304.GA5944@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20061208125928.GA25427@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061208125928.GA25427@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 576 Lines: 15 On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:59:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > UML on i386 is now the only case where fastcall/FASTCALL is not a noop. If i386 doesn't use it any more, then UML shouldn't either. The only reason there's support for it in UML is that I was copying i386. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/