Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1163272AbWLGUQ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:16:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1163276AbWLGUQ2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:16:28 -0500 Received: from lug-owl.de ([195.71.106.12]:33432 "EHLO lug-owl.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1163272AbWLGUQ2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:16:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 21:16:27 +0100 From: Michael Westermann To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: DTR/DSR handshake in kernelspace third traying Message-ID: <20061207201626.GA10920@dvmwest.dvmwest.de> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Westermann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1033 Lines: 33 Hello, I've send 2 patches for a DTS/DSR handshaking to the list http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/7/76 and long long time ago 1998 My problem are manufacturers the make printers with DTR/DSR Handschaking. POS Printers are very sensible for a buffer overrun! For on or two printers, we can wire a adapter, for 10000...30000 printers is a software option the better way. I've write a patch for 2.2 and published it, I've write a patch for 2.4 and published it, but i've see there is no DTR/DSR Handshaking in the kernel 2.6. I'm a litte bit frusted. Are a few thousands pos-systems not enough for upgrading the standard kernel sources? Have I a really chance to commit a patch for kernel 2.6. What is the best way to handle this problem. Thanks for comments ;-) Michael Westermann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/