Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp706175pxb; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:07:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwR8ma3miRcfpc3oM28Q2yocoF9xtjbTLuGxIifwd8d9XEDUtj6wvrlGsQVqpzb4pQjfM/s X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5045:: with SMTP id e5mr5814490ejk.239.1630613246434; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:07:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630613246; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GlRijMiQKHfIk/6dN7g7AtVwxoXZtj6R3zZwm8BCiTvL5WvBQlM2Ur5uMjq1SU0Pz7 AEUdTFIe2usK24cfNvHvRs62zr1a9Akl6xLg1wkRQDnskF9I7jDz4O72gcmk117Up7U6 B1Zjj5MMcj45CbpGHU1zNTsPHIw6d35t27soBLFM7FMe2amAc0ire3/4k/wtkKYxluyO JFNn5MimGRhIo+FPqCzYV8M5S/Zq4MBIQdEEuQWhqEDu9WzY75CpYC95Om0MVTf7ZWSk jfl6XfaOe++o2mdQY+3oT3jjibh4wQUXBhpXtN+oVyIfchKoSRr5wp/uNWEc4E5xLrjQ jG3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=KFRJtBYqpxE6l8U93CjJaHtl7i5thjud7IuDAtWzZF8=; b=rhAJfzjPYq20UPFTeQfV4rFR4A8EF6cRZByiS7uQ3hGtKHxam3flbHjI4oJY+v9obJ 4ACIpLUDDGIfoIdkmTmKEpvBUqwql2v3nPI2ot3ZRZIC3FGvQH/XzKgDphn26ATLEQzq y0FC6yJWUubD3D8xzzCiUhNwo0xt1+CHAg18lOsfDsUryZUIMqt0b8LpIHyZ52YiTfbU k5cu+Z5eWN9L2PiFpDiiFaTeXaYYa+4cxPGQYnXNKeUXoq5HUgkpEHeux+CnYHV6RORw ZpMdj6Alhld3fObx/0epoLcFoIaIlsOAyl4ydU7estNnOfU6x9vED7w723vGjxE81gUa 42lg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f14si2569081ejj.667.2021.09.02.13.07.03; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345446AbhIBOzU (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:55:20 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45850 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229941AbhIBOzT (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:55:19 -0400 Received: from oasis.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE9EB6108B; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 14:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:54:13 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , bpf , LKML , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/ftrace: Add direct batch interface Message-ID: <20210902105158.3816e193@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20210831095017.412311-1-jolsa@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 21:06:45 +0200 Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 08:23:38AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > Steven, > > > > Could you review and merge this set for this merge window, > > so we can process related bpf bits for the next cycle? > > actually I might have sent it out too early, there's still > bpf part review discussion that might end up in interface > change Regardless, it is way too late to apply this to the current merge window. I don't think Linus would appreciate me pulling in a complex patch set 4 days into the merge window, review it, and then push it to him without much faith that this wont cause any major issues in use cases we did not think about. Not to mention, I would have to drop everything I am responsible for to do that. I would never ask another maintainer to do such an irresponsible act. > > review would be great, but please hold on with the merge I just got back from an 8 day vacation, and my inbox is way out of hand, and I still need to put together the changes that have been in linux-next for some time, and get that to Linus. Hopefully I'll get to looking at this sometime next week. -- Steve