Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp714958pxb; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:20:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyotsRegG459xBIvo9SOXw4P2EORZblkfAOAVIqEPbkKJmJEKIX4MHjq1bAdNhzNn9IeqKo X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:730a:: with SMTP id di10mr5652691ejc.428.1630614057236; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:20:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630614057; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L/ROJIAbDf/H7PRMWweHySBiOaSfV9tqZjWYv+zMk8kvN3dK2A++0xqWMGFiSxgPs6 gfmJiTwUVg0kBQ+QQ0Kv412LhENQhEJtS8H6gfrZXZ9oVrt3GckX6gz6jBrrWFSnXLFS fv/nd0I7MM//hliyRZJIux8W9AuDn9geMpBSSDBX/uMEOsLqI58rwsadyGLQ3FRoZW1Q bAbFsh5OnKMkG+gIIS/NeWuuD8m7Ti+cO7SlHSHriETQT6SCveA8rSBJKgK1ZOvPi2ko +MhfGHfxf7TORhHTitpVoEMj6vabXz2LU0ASE2GR/0FL8LbB/Mc6FeNsQ9OXMtWR7Xb+ VnFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=FylD6f7m14eKF3XYaQ1r2SyiA9KMl3lNzVJ+1i/VQ1k=; b=JOVm8zt2c2oRICXoxumG0C8OmFL0icowxJz7HATAvXOhyKu7shnchnk4Wx+9DNUQN6 xg/EARUaWIn7YUn1rV7rsN/heavzN9mGmn6bC7t6KIKgpuX9E8yMRVb2Qn7ZiEX+2njB XX6/i0fd594B8aVHPXDkg2pe9YFkChO4N5yxX9Ju51s0dqpARAUEyxxBvvI6n47fDXbv /CK1oJnqyUXA0VFTTQrmOQOO6myGt3y25Vd2QPT7KWnybjqBF8jUkE3oEq7XMj+DeVvn /+p5sSn4DaTqizh3ijgG+w79lUVD1NeoUgusvdJollsw48zx8ek3wwpozyKd7ewODg8e 1aBg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cy12si3467422edb.517.2021.09.02.13.20.26; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347003AbhIBSjw (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 14:39:52 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:60528 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241887AbhIBSjv (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 14:39:51 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:59228) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mLrbs-00AOHQ-FC; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:38:48 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:33754 helo=email.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mLrbr-00BVCf-8A; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:38:48 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org References: <7d391d915d2bd1c0f601f55f61f8dd4c70066229.1629732940.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:38:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7d391d915d2bd1c0f601f55f61f8dd4c70066229.1629732940.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (Christophe Leroy's message of "Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:35:55 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <87y28ex1ov.fsf@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1mLrbr-00BVCf-8A;;;mid=<87y28ex1ov.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/JbCUfWpO6Fsqk7Caq1QaH7v2nM7V7vug= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, T_TooManySym_02,T_TooManySym_03,XMGappySubj_01,XMGappySubj_02, XMSubLong,XM_B_SpammyTLD,XM_B_SpammyWords,XM_Body_Dirty_Words autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.0 XMGappySubj_02 Gappier still * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_03 6+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject * 0.2 XM_B_SpammyWords One or more commonly used spammy words * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 1.0 XM_Body_Dirty_Words Contains a dirty word * 1.0 XM_B_SpammyTLD Contains uncommon/spammy TLD X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ****;Christophe Leroy X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 664 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 13 (2.0%), b_tie_ro: 11 (1.6%), parse: 1.11 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 18 (2.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.96 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 16 (2.4%), tests_pri_-950: 1.57 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.36 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 106 (16.0%), check_bayes: 103 (15.6%), b_tokenize: 7 (1.1%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (1.2%), b_comp_prob: 2.3 (0.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 80 (12.1%), b_finish: 1.48 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 339 (51.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.61 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.6 (0.5%), poll_dns_idle: 138 (20.7%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.3%), tests_pri_500: 163 (24.5%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] powerpc/signal: Use unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user() X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christophe Leroy writes: > Use unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user() in order to do the copy > within the user access block. > > On an mpc 8321 (book3s/32) the improvment is about 5% on a process > sending a signal to itself. Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" copy_siginfo_to_user is not the same as copy_siginfo_to_user32. As in this patch breaks 32bit userspace on powerpc. > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 13 ++++++------- > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 5 +---- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c > index ff101e2b3bab..f9e16d108bc8 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c > @@ -710,12 +710,6 @@ static long restore_tm_user_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mcontext __user *s > } > #endif > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 > - > -#define copy_siginfo_to_user copy_siginfo_to_user32 > - > -#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ > - > /* > * Set up a signal frame for a "real-time" signal handler > * (one which gets siginfo). > @@ -779,14 +773,19 @@ int handle_rt_signal32(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *oldset, > asm("dcbst %y0; sync; icbi %y0; sync" :: "Z" (mctx->mc_pad[0])); > } > unsafe_put_sigset_t(&frame->uc.uc_sigmask, oldset, failed); > +#ifndef CONFIG_COMPAT > + unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info, failed); > +#endif > > /* create a stack frame for the caller of the handler */ > unsafe_put_user(regs->gpr[1], newsp, failed); > > user_access_end(); > > - if (copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info)) > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > + if (copy_siginfo_to_user32(&frame->info, &ksig->info)) > goto badframe; > +#endif > > regs->link = tramp; > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c > index 2cca6c8febe1..82b73fbd937d 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c > @@ -901,15 +901,12 @@ int handle_rt_signal64(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set, > } > > unsafe_copy_to_user(&frame->uc.uc_sigmask, set, sizeof(*set), badframe_block); > + unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info, badframe_block); > /* Allocate a dummy caller frame for the signal handler. */ > unsafe_put_user(regs->gpr[1], newsp, badframe_block); > > user_write_access_end(); > > - /* Save the siginfo outside of the unsafe block. */ > - if (copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info)) > - goto badframe; > - > /* Make sure signal handler doesn't get spurious FP exceptions */ > tsk->thread.fp_state.fpscr = 0;