Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:eb17:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hx23csp34749pxb; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:32:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1Br/TAm9ERKWZPS4gazN3Y1QZt0eTNmK1GB4Xxs+cao4wOUkHzuq18dnQO1VhhVzqyxR9 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:cf:: with SMTP id z15mr1059824ioe.4.1630632765485; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 18:32:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630632765; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PuqD8f9Qc2p1UA8CkriVlZ087C33RpGr8tQtCYIe9lzzhmWmY11jVpl/byOC+4M0pL Ywe1uSjPGCjRM3/dHQjifVhI0bvuoN05O1kI+id1MrvOE1+7/uGtFdm1M7qHwzrOiK4h VBLG5Zj/p6kjBewyYxfDamNYpYH0jQkpL/XB6xXOt3XiDSUsep8fzN+Dn/n8tVW5xno4 /HAfTnXF/hn6omirh6ELlBXRhM/QJkvwPYBFTJ2yofxAnQqK3AujeFmTwcVxG9bTbNk6 xH+em2mY5V0tz1AXc85X172xs+qRwKKFXv/rYUwixqvQHgSmy+Uu+8z+UkEfWrZxgHva PhXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=NkN5TNB/RrUPxS3oGH9hsOFgveMfRt3tup9G6sQBl4A=; b=CMxCFqAJPnyCgWkIqJU2beALSWGJrTo0ndcWeNz/0+PK2Zj8rQO5i7k7JUemR5Omup r5K3iYy2z1ROScUAruAY7VDq37CWYTliguRHejfabjmuav/ZudqWrSnoiieYeYhKhq8Q l0wNXjuhYWkAdThRhmP7bFP5u7v+F4FxHYUjeiw1EybI7gZZkSHo8Zm4smAzQ7AliG1k +aGkB7CLO4QuNLJRY4OzteWbnCWvrABZBvFyw/nRJNO3pOkmMAzmTCE6YQpmttbBbRWl 3EPtFof6tBy7zl+uhn1B9+oKooauaAQLp7Saq23egN0M7bBhbD/Y+usJU9SXSJSQmuyC e/Tw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Fk+6Et1c; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 126si3413613jaw.85.2021.09.02.18.32.34; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 18:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Fk+6Et1c; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347849AbhIBWz3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:55:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53376 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1348526AbhIBWyb (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:54:31 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC40BC061575; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 15:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com with SMTP id a93so6850136ybi.1; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:53:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NkN5TNB/RrUPxS3oGH9hsOFgveMfRt3tup9G6sQBl4A=; b=Fk+6Et1cXuf5QLiY1KbCB35TBJYRkkKpa4ZkIO8ftoR8YyqBQl6X7Zd9LOOT2p+sFm mW6UF7TRboUjxGclc/JzDosCwJDd4Xlm+V6IDqDljBKEX+77V8CjIgCJD0p+chbO1FyQ L95KX5CRjpJDKBjMu9aoIn6191daUsvECPtezqgg1C4EOqSADhpbkqf41SiTbPolICr4 7lSlwgi49RwGT+IxRfps3XhsiAcxilkOFr1X/bQl3CyIf7pxW7q8sxU5ptOCNe5RNksQ GIIbO9kZmOQ/r9Uag9BX8i4ec5i6kqJhN2wis7mlQNXLJXjVBXheS3rdQg3wc6W6Ead7 P9NQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NkN5TNB/RrUPxS3oGH9hsOFgveMfRt3tup9G6sQBl4A=; b=k3G/OCvEVcefXmooK/X6dVxz927+C1A2w0fIHznAeAc9FrrdjWDWRRy6MEgsvL3Con EwSbbs2T+kG1pofNIgi95iYyVheSLilxg/yB+nQKh5RD4xrvi19qx+U1/bWHVB3E64yX rXYk3lXpXDKW2l4Z+BR4jKMGAAxsXlNf3bcpriPjm5riKdgXjof4cm35IUS+gdzJICoq KQ73RurN31AwmjTIMotXXJS+kW+21uS+L9ruG5tb/5YV4KVHWclmZLwWqY4dsuFQlvJf TpTK5jZf08aw4WGVjeSkD9ADC0TQBAHp/YhcACiG07C3apHMl7XmrDpszZH6wL0jJQIa vCkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531WnNLciuSwPP/aDHixXtklEP8f0svLMa9NcI/GQwO+cOL6TJPz 3vCbFWPCN0xiQANEpU03Hz/mXTl2oLDFNrz3hC8= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4941:: with SMTP id w62mr1046684yba.230.1630623211143; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:53:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210902165706.2812867-1-songliubraving@fb.com> <20210902165706.2812867-3-songliubraving@fb.com> In-Reply-To: <20210902165706.2812867-3-songliubraving@fb.com> From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 15:53:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] bpf: introduce helper bpf_get_branch_snapshot To: Song Liu Cc: bpf , open list , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Ziljstra , Ingo Molnar , Kajol Jain , Kernel Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:58 AM Song Liu wrote: > > Introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot(), which allows tracing pogram to get > branch trace from hardware (e.g. Intel LBR). To use the feature, the > user need to create perf_event with proper branch_record filtering > on each cpu, and then calls bpf_get_branch_snapshot in the bpf function. > On Intel CPUs, VLBR event (raw event 0x1b00) can be use for this. > > Signed-off-by: Song Liu > --- > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 3 ++- > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > index 791f31dd0abee..c986e6fad5bc0 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > @@ -4877,6 +4877,27 @@ union bpf_attr { > * Get the struct pt_regs associated with **task**. > * Return > * A pointer to struct pt_regs. > + * > + * long bpf_get_branch_snapshot(void *entries, u32 size, u64 flags) > + * Description > + * Get branch trace from hardware engines like Intel LBR. The > + * branch trace is taken soon after the trigger point of the > + * BPF program, so it may contain some entries after the This part is a leftover from previous design, so not relevant anymore? > + * trigger point. The user need to filter these entries > + * accordingly. > + * > + * The data is stored as struct perf_branch_entry into output > + * buffer *entries*. *size* is the size of *entries* in bytes. > + * *flags* is reserved for now and must be zero. > + * > + * Return > + * On success, number of bytes written to *buf*. On error, a > + * negative value. > + * > + * **-EINVAL** if arguments invalid or **size** not a multiple > + * of **sizeof**\ (**struct perf_branch_entry**\ ). > + * > + * **-ENOENT** if architecture does not support branch records. [...]