Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:03:57 -0400
From:   Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To:     Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Cc:     Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
        fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, virtio-fs@redhat.com,
        Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
        David Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@intel.com>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        selinux@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
        Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>,
        stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/1] xfstests: generic/062: Do not run on newer kernels
Message-ID: <YTJHbaFGJOn4TNj8@redhat.com>
References: <20210902152228.665959-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>
 <YTDyE9wVQQBxS77r@redhat.com>
 <CAHc6FU4ytU5eo4bmJcL6MW+qJZAtYTX0=wTZnv4myhDBv-qZHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHc6FU5quZWQtZ3fRfM_ZseUsweEbJA0aAkZvQEF5u9MJhrqdQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPL3RVH9MDoDAdiZ-nm3a4BgmRyZJUc_PV_MpsEWiuh6QPi+pA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YTJCjGH0V5yzMnQB@redhat.com>
 <CAPL3RVFB67-AqZrjjfxueQF1Jw=LmKWzCk3Ur94EjUotYMw0AA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPL3RVFB67-AqZrjjfxueQF1Jw=LmKWzCk3Ur94EjUotYMw0AA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 11:50:43AM -0400, Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:43 AM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:42:34AM -0400, Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > Well, we could also look at supporting trusted.* xattrs over NFS.  I
> > > don't know much about them, but it looks like it wouldn't be a lot of
> > > work to specify, especially now that we've already got user xattrs?
> > > We'd just write a new internet draft that refers to the existing
> > > user.* xattr draft for most of the details.
> >
> > Will be nice if we can support trusted.* xattrs on NFS.
> 
> Maybe I should start a separate thread for that.  Who would need to be
> on it to be sure we get this right?

I will like to be on cc list.

Vivek