Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] regulator: qcom_smd: Add PM6125 regulator support
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht
References: <20210828115654.647548-1-iskren.chernev@gmail.com>
 <20210828115654.647548-3-iskren.chernev@gmail.com>
 <20210903152331.GK4932@sirena.org.uk>
From:   Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b02e3ba5-b3fe-8963-8457-62304a39e100@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Sep 2021 22:49:52 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210903152331.GK4932@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 9/3/21 6:23 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 02:56:54PM +0300, Iskren Chernev wrote:
> 
>> NOTE: The sources haven't been determined, so currently each regulator
>> has it's own source.
> 
> It would probably be safer to just leave them unspecified for now and
> then add them as people figure out what's going on rather than putting
> something incorrect into the DT bindings.

I didn't expect this patch to be mergeable, so I didn't add the dt-bindings.

So should I add bindings and just ignore all the sources (add them later)?

Regards,
Iskren