Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:eb17:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hx23csp934305pxb; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 17:56:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuCvrBsNXeetqQS0O0ROcpm+wMZ1B6qd0Q1tmczeI5Z43pE3OWWySWMZ0WGTQf9myhWowy X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:150c:: with SMTP id b12mr1684040ejd.275.1630716960644; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:56:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630716960; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fuzciZ5I2mkUJ15ZHRoxtzJV7gShHfOvTeEeOWgpT/yhAI6tuRDZLSY2uz4+QBVOa0 Og05a+dMqlaVYI8Y5Xz/8dr19Elh3s8uEisZZoG5yT3mX7cDMcyIq+V/q0ac7ZdBsYpE /lMqAroBZlcgdwyKpgQxoNyZz8AJAUSUBAQfNXr9uBKFfKAHkMHccJnuuRqFGdurZBSs Vu699aDJN4bmuPHqM9KFSesB5qWSmd/R6LM1qKYjkn+rqPz8DYvT1Oxr5MPCwDOKP3z8 pyH6qgQdZUimRMEAEn1xxZb6NuSupvw8fnrMig8crKKsK7YcJMTEqKTMJklmAk+AGfN+ 5RKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=Uz3M4WmCspE/SP/HhtAcp2zgUd6rTexaM0a2iXogNnM=; b=RdsMRbkaQMKz/ngVBHQxJmOA6iFbcdJOvtfznAzgT+W/LfnWPhfPkJVUABSAgcysYG ZPzh+PGUwpWNNoaX5ZP201SbpXD6zt+PA1pp6YaLWk9WY7Jpt7keqlKuKIf9T5ujA11c GwTp/4VLCkCKUCRH58QQv0SnccFDe5gPiufMlthlwkw+yX8+yXW8266a1g3ZuoePWBri GljF6zOJmBN+yxEY8057NFWYQYJ+sr6j8FQUqgiqDbbcra3uwBGwy59Nx+PO59U0+1jK /qXd5vAsmLEe0czEMqOXNKA5NPAdWWZtQcp4wTD91qZg3+60+9bKtHi9b+hSpo9cSiPk 12oQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Efddl6Z5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dn6si657910ejc.281.2021.09.03.17.55.37; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Efddl6Z5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350743AbhIDAuQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Sep 2021 20:50:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39366 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236127AbhIDAuP (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2021 20:50:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFD7C061575 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 17:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id m26so794082pff.3 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:49:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uz3M4WmCspE/SP/HhtAcp2zgUd6rTexaM0a2iXogNnM=; b=Efddl6Z5Kjdb+t6KIEqKq1iAabmBKR59ZWQE8sjbwA90r0296NrPr1ML6xLYhjOOAp iNeTM2zi0D1md6WRX4Vj86zjZnXvoalsDjkck3MnR2TvpQRkmdpqfA38ZTi8gcEKTs3A f4en4XoF6OytXl8FimebaqzaLqqa364yMsm1Ym8oMK3tM/6ZQ7K9o3qn1DzyavXbG2Im gXgCLFVXOpAm3+Njqo2fcxEF2vUZr+Zy23kxIu3WjtBbjpOzzP0v/ttRy39ZiMIs9/Ga nBeVPeUk09kL47UWMMKSxBoXXqKNLXL5T81/hNlxJLWX/99jYarp9QTQFDQvrUixOXvV +i8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uz3M4WmCspE/SP/HhtAcp2zgUd6rTexaM0a2iXogNnM=; b=gx2Ih/Fywr1uDpUqOQbUIk94nGtiAfMW29IKyfZrjtB7TrTZX3s8jTjR1YLcIkNYpL rt1S/L40E78Db9b+ehzKobqApqIjQR0gcb40L/WdjZCgVEFgaCENqTJYS/itwyQe+mrb 6qOjZCCGgJA/zmX/dwK6gUshIUJvXUfDwkudwFj1TQpfpvFcCfSfxI3BF0hvuO+YsiSU XW/hpeG6SbEXzJ2TPzJwn+AF/4JAXsbICoYZmGR8ewSpEWIyGgku8cr6hDTtS9xO2Bcm ooPn2GBSXU8bols6bqjeYfauxrbQ89IHORAstbFbb2BO9joRilVV1QwcGHPeANQA2bgM L2tQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PiBNs0PQ1sSa5OL+AAQZfNqHwVggYFWBVoWGGZPgizXV+YUDL 2e4H23e6ns++3ICF+C5AemSy7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:aca:b029:392:9c79:3a39 with SMTP id c10-20020a056a000acab02903929c793a39mr1461401pfl.57.1630716554735; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.4.41] (cpe-72-132-29-68.dc.res.rr.com. [72.132.29.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u24sm475478pfm.85.2021.09.03.17.49.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in __io_arm_poll_handler To: syzbot , asml.silence@gmail.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, Dmitry Vyukov References: <000000000000f0da6305cb1feacb@google.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <15a67989-9ad7-11ef-9472-8e16ca6ec11a@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 18:49:11 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000000000000f0da6305cb1feacb@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/3/21 5:47 PM, syzbot wrote: > Hello, > > syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue: > > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+ba74b85fa15fd7a96437@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Tested on: > > commit: 31efe48e io_uring: fix possible poll event lost in mul.. > git tree: git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block for-5.15/io_uring > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=914bb805fa8e8da9 > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ba74b85fa15fd7a96437 > compiler: Debian clang version 11.0.1-2, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1 > > Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only. Dmitry, I wonder if there's a way to have syzbot know about what it's testing and be able to run the pending patches for that tree? I think we're up to 4 reports now that are all just fallout from the same bug, and where a patch has been queued up for a few days. Since they all look different, I can't fault syzbot for thinking they are different, even if they have the same root cause. Any way we can make this situation better? I can't keep replying that we should test the current branch, and it'd be a shame to have a ton of dupes. -- Jens Axboe