Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:eb17:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hx23csp1886174pxb; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 02:13:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbTrBiO1vLJOrz26RtP+1dsciVy7NeCYEyQqsVwCEUfVHlYu6q13s9+s9yUjRKFuOcPP0Y X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:399:: with SMTP id y25mr6088977jap.23.1630833209814; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 02:13:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630833209; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wjqF5kG2THDeeX1y+0W3sB9i8k1fJ53qU+WQ2ovyxS5zFO6c/XhRf3ChugSFuTjPfu 652i/eU0crkIV2fkcsMcWNADtI+rgIXeu8XRuRJpcf2M0SyDxxyFNpL/Pq2QSgmmMNTj Vb/W+vmwdheT+Qo++Fe85pfCXn5NeLCGY5OfwtI9hS4LR7BtVWhIXFGGBhjamzGyjo+j 9d4kQkrVjpJDcg+thKPx0raPnoaJEU1mF66N2zNvSyNoJ63301jmbSdULuUXJZfLL4me Ts/sRQVDcpfUEVU1+yDRUappf9UFjw1xVAtIIGFeBu3GYZwdxig5YGCDlglsF6/nLaOI LLsA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=DWe4SBHWNXl5FE9qn2VJb7VDnMvUiHPVGeO0+pMg1FY=; b=qMCIfg0K7wsUZcd0FoxZ7todzbcURl7vZg/uL5/Q2oj6OvDuwH8RpoKEp56poJAFW1 iPIeykD9gu6u3VbqWA7+DCmnMhB6ErHM8KIyOE/xBvsq6Mni1Xi51DvkK5BTDp5cHjfT 1fzbJ2IkmSpxqSgRh1vaW83DZ6ayn+eCuuOGT+ix4XTnIsRl8MH/0DQ7yRWL9DWbPGFp gAKKB9ttvAY+0y1Vh+WAlBViL/fHgnrro48TDy4OohSgrYG0FayZVhjQ85O3IEUdX0x5 M30U1Ff7C101qaC22Xfc0VWfL0YPV1Z1YyCVXVmfl1QlISE/FTlX0jhuMh+7wKb3VfkZ ah3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t3si4448904ilj.52.2021.09.05.02.12.55; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 02:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236696AbhIEJMJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 5 Sep 2021 05:12:09 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:52572 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229691AbhIEJMI (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2021 05:12:08 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10097"; a="206980093" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,269,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="206980093" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2021 02:11:05 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,269,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="535866588" Received: from yjin15-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.168.84]) ([10.249.168.84]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2021 02:11:01 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] perf pmu: Add PMU alias support To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, rickyman7@gmail.com, john.garry@huawei.com, Kan Liang References: <20210902065955.1299-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <20210902065955.1299-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> From: "Jin, Yao" Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 17:10:58 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnaldo, On 9/3/2021 7:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Committer notes: > > Rename 'struct perf_pmu_alias_name' to 'pmu_alias', the 'perf_' prefix > should be used for libperf, things inside just tools/perf/ are being > moved away from that prefix. > > Also 'pmu_alias' is shorter and reflects the abstraction. > > Also don't use 'pmu' as the name for variables for that type, we should > use that for the 'struct perf_pmu' variables, avoiding confusion. Use > 'pmu_alias' for 'struct pmu_alias' variables. I fully agree your recommended changes. I think Kan will agree too. :) Thanks so much! Thanks Jin Yao