Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:eb17:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hx23csp1899832pxb; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 02:44:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwbDR2+twmeX6DewyUvZjhhz54vlhhx1cg3sFZA1fMphFITPwqUcJoZrQPhCRWMX2eOjxg X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9693:: with SMTP id m19mr5589874ion.181.1630835090491; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 02:44:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630835090; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cme3rpMsFDdXrG7tsPa4zdK7pJfx6bJ8HK46cX4ezi3MMwiTKf1rTXfwqI3h5bamlW WWRPblQP+YmUl4M+hsMKykzLRlzVBlbnSi0/aOfE5t6cKEtauVFV0WUSqar0Rsa5pDPi sw6DtoiYs0hB+hP58irmz/8fs16oa1VIPTXDBiVwQ4ffDGPbr2GLGI56pIkbe1/4DVwi JhkOIiYdYOO4ugSEwgOI7Fu4YK8vJJISQAsLwiWpYBc+o+XgUfyH0g+a8YZaq8dzYDSo DwE5Egk5Ox6q5B+PK6O9sf9RTJQQ7QcI7iHsGRLUcPAVmAKeUK53KEVhH8LSaMRmdc5+ yLDw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=ifi11QekfcWZNVm3VTCZukCC3eZRANe1luBYgj5xjzw=; b=ulxPHFHU+Lw+E+1SU1sQhXXDuFAx7wjOBT2wX6TLSXY9S6bOJeDLNLz3vMeOehhitd PykupDZ3BpeA3mtXM/TyBbkjZmDtLurcWsXkXbhQIzGImCNIHgeVDiD/i93hY1cqLhwT e3WxuSNrZR8YXmtice9v7ajNH3eO46HcAIzv9SlP/uBW+IJqwdY9Bg2u28ZmszZRFsvL YuYIFhAlBo+UAxM46l3P7FYdb0G6MdCiRbC6L9YhyqUL9KnMA+BjqfTphKohU+AHID68 eMfknpSBSgCsm9rBPyqa7/w1rfn8vLI/7Arhmrs9TuwydXVXeNiu0vCHuadgCSI8unRH 0/sg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h12si4568785ilj.100.2021.09.05.02.44.39; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 02:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237118AbhIEJk5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 5 Sep 2021 05:40:57 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33180 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229691AbhIEJk4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2021 05:40:56 -0400 Received: from jic23-huawei (cpc108967-cmbg20-2-0-cust86.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.101.6.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFABD60EE6; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 09:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:43:13 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Miquel Raynal Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] iio: adc: max1027: Support software triggers Message-ID: <20210905104313.66a6a59a@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20210902172100.3200b3b6@xps13> References: <20210818111139.330636-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20210818111139.330636-16-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20210830115046.3727ccc4@jic23-huawei> <20210902172100.3200b3b6@xps13> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 17:21:00 +0200 Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > Jonathan Cameron wrote on Mon, 30 Aug 2021 11:50:46 > +0100: > > > On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:11:38 +0200 > > Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > > > Now that max1027_trigger_handler() has been freed from handling hardware > > > triggers EOC situations, we can use it for what it has been designed in > > > the first place: trigger software originated conversions. > > > > As mentioned earlier, this is not how I'd normally expect this sort of > > case to be handled. I'd be expecting the cnvst trigger to still be calling > > this function and the function to do the relevant check to ensure it > > knows the data is already available in that case. > > I tried to follow your advice and Nuno's regarding this, I hope the new > version will match your expectations (new version coming soon). > However if my changes do not match, I will probably need more guidance > to understand in deep what you suggest. > > > > In other > > > words, when userspace initiates a conversion with a sysfs trigger or a > > > hrtimer trigger, we must do all configuration steps, ie: > > > 1- Configuring the trigger > > > 2- Configuring the channels to scan > > > 3- Starting the conversion (actually done automatically by step 2 in > > > this case) > > > 4- Waiting for the conversion to end > > > 5- Retrieving the data from the ADC > > > 6- Push the data to the IIO core and notify it > > > > > > Add the missing steps to this helper and drop the trigger verification > > > hook otherwise software triggers would simply not be accepted at all. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal > > > --- > > > drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c > > > index 8c5995ae59f2..bb437e43adaf 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c > > > @@ -413,17 +413,6 @@ static int max1027_debugfs_reg_access(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > > > return spi_write(st->spi, val, 1); > > > } > > > > > > -static int max1027_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > > > - struct iio_trigger *trig) > > > -{ > > > - struct max1027_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > > - > > > - if (st->trig != trig) > > > - return -EINVAL; > > > - > > > - return 0; > > > -} > > > - > > > static int max1027_set_cnvst_trigger_state(struct iio_trigger *trig, bool state) > > > { > > > struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig); > > > @@ -512,7 +501,21 @@ static irqreturn_t max1027_trigger_handler(int irq, void *private) > > > > > > pr_debug("%s(irq=%d, private=0x%p)\n", __func__, irq, private); > > > > > > + ret = max1027_configure_trigger(indio_dev); > > > > I'd not expect to see this ever time. The configuration shouldn't change > > from one call of this function to the next. > > True, this is not needed. > > > > + if (ret) > > > + goto out; > > > + > > > + ret = max1027_configure_chans_to_scan(indio_dev); > > > > This should also not change unless it is also responsible for the 'go' signal. > > If that's true then it is badly named. > > It's responsible for the go signal, I renamed it "configure_and_start". > > However, just for my own understanding, when would I be supposed to > configure the channels requested by the user otherwise? For buffered operation update_scan_mask callback. There is a quirk where that's not called on the buffer disable path because it's not always obvious what to 'reset to'. J > > Thanks, > Miquèl