Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:13:07 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc:     Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wsa@kernel.org,
        wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, arnd@arndb.de,
        jasowang@redhat.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
        yu1.wang@intel.com, shuo.a.liu@intel.com, conghui.chen@intel.com,
        stefanha@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
Message-ID: <20210906044307.se4dcld2wlblieyv@vireshk-i7>
References: <984ebecaf697058eb73389ed14ead9dd6d38fb53.1625796246.git.jie.deng@intel.com>
 <20210904160059-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210904160059-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 04-09-21, 16:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Same as with qemu bits, I am confused as to what is the status
> of proposed spec changes and whether the driver will work
> with them.

This is already merged as well.

The current version simply fails to transmit the messages in case the
length of a buffer is 0. I have patch ready to make it work with the
proposed spec changes, just waiting for them to be accepted.

> Let's let the dust settle on them then, then
> resubmit?

It doesn't break anything for now since we don't have much users and
we know zero length transfers don't work. I will submit the necessary
changes once spec is finalized.

-- 
viresh