Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+G9fYvMaHgSied79QBs3D=eDVETGH=3gxA8owCSRj313yEhVg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YTTbD+BKRpd0g4hq@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <YTTbD+BKRpd0g4hq@kroah.com>
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 6 Sep 2021 13:10:34 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYs-K2f+eZW55u5uh1gQedTQpm=TGDNk7K1uOk8AeDNUQA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: kernel/kexec_file.o: failed: Cannot find symbol for section 10: .text.unlikely.
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:28:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > Following build errors noticed while building stable rc Linux 5.13.14
> > with gcc-11 for powerpc architecture.

<trim>
> Is this a regression?  Has this compiler ever been able to build this
> arch like this?

Yes. It is a regression with gcc-11.

stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-11 - powerpc - FAILED
stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-10 - powerpc - PASSED

- Naresh