Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032399AbWLGQuL (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:50:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1032401AbWLGQuK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:50:10 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:38657 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032399AbWLGQuH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:50:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:47:56 -0500 From: Vivek Goyal To: Michael Neuling Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , fastboot@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] free initrds boot option Message-ID: <20061207164756.GA13873@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com References: <4410.1165450723@neuling.org> <20061206163021.f434f09b.akpm@osdl.org> <4577624A.6010008@zytor.com> <13639.1165462578@neuling.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13639.1165462578@neuling.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1393 Lines: 32 On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:36:18PM +1100, Michael Neuling wrote: > > I would have to agree with this; it also seems a bit odd to me to have > > this at all (kexec provides a new kernel image, surely it also > > provides a new initrd image???) > Yes, kexec provides the option --initrd, so that a user can supply an initrd image to be loaded along with kernel. > The first boot will need to hold a copy of the in memory fs for the > second boot. This image can be large (much larger than the kernel), > hence we can save time when the memory loader is slow. Also, it reduces > the memory footprint while extracting the first boot since you don't > need another copy of the fs. > Is there a kexec-tools patch too? How does second kernel know about the location of the first kernel's initrd to be reused? In general kexec can overwrite all the previous kernel's memory. It just knows about the segments the user has passed to it and it will place these segments to their destination locations. There are no gurantees that in this process some data from first kernel will not be overwritten. So it might not be a very safe scheme. Thanks Vivek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/