Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:eb17:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hx23csp2757862pxb; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 04:51:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0VtkrgW4jo6dwFY3uqx00qQpYM3YrUmhn9Nrg7dANC0P7ME2GhAUG8Pn9kC6qCOLxr14C X-Received: by 2002:a6b:fb07:: with SMTP id h7mr9574655iog.201.1630929077624; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 04:51:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630929077; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lU7sd7d+GHBF3ayi90oTioXM3Z74HNu7bZpuFt8GvFa7fHjyrni9P4kKkHlDaC4iAv 3UykYLGMPmyO8cvKCacj23tPhP1eDKMfZr1hHH6hWx4D1ohEhu+2/E8hN3C91XeT0tel VRMG8DwqUX7ji6UDOnWm54n4bqAFiv2caqtPBaDAJMA7hPkMwSjbbn61MYzCWhqt8uaA 3tsB+IfM4rgP72TDDJUsY9+KeOEy1m4DtG4li8iWYjimthlkeretmqcB1MFOQVNgLc6+ OIEJt/ocud4bwU/R5WoXyCgSXBdwx+Xpzm7ZqaDGs9jTsvFMnWQH4sdcMVGrHExpv7tz 5wDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:subject :organization:from:references:cc:to:dkim-signature; bh=zXE8dWQl68fSLFYKCn3Z80ZMxW3TXAEFPhGPj75Fg9E=; b=Tts1v6mI3+q57bla/Ylc+Au434yex6u4vIkP9PMEAWrloh4WkLQWhdT6JZpCrgY60n BFMchTp/K6eweCLBnh3mHr72Hh6aAfE7dT/U6P+xBIsDbnwieyNcX66Nh5sVMWvlD2na YT/cQXB0EP90JhhbHhNsGSO23nlFmT/RyQobepN1CN8qCW1LxdQQVXyX6T+dvU+aHf6D Pbrg1Wc1x18i+Cg4ddmHrQ6zYge+hNImwDLTtAhs0iRk8ozT9CbQrs2c1HkEejgW7EFd 2HZwbK+uQ6PNl43v7bqhtz6lbT5xqkoaOaDDPO7T4jIoMJG6jZ7WMSk31Hm9CHllUx7R F45g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=DiZJwsYO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q7si9016323ilu.111.2021.09.06.04.51.05; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 04:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=DiZJwsYO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238529AbhIFLvS (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 07:51:18 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:28417 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238449AbhIFLvS (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 07:51:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630929013; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zXE8dWQl68fSLFYKCn3Z80ZMxW3TXAEFPhGPj75Fg9E=; b=DiZJwsYOzDsBY/pT0HZaQIqUBlgWwaLWzlFtgr/W/eUL1GVFT5F1d0iuS5Cl2DLPJgXvHO gXxew7myMZth3jbzi/JqkCmBtsf/iHCDFNr7ANfFFNWEtBZ9duR8qQ79itLdz0m38rjBdA xeXbEGiFgqk83qNlr5pEMU0NkmRsx08= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-588-rxGhVG62NbaZ1QTjhYr6Rg-1; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:50:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rxGhVG62NbaZ1QTjhYr6Rg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id y24-20020a7bcd98000000b002eb50db2b62so3131064wmj.5 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 04:50:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:references:from:organization:subject :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zXE8dWQl68fSLFYKCn3Z80ZMxW3TXAEFPhGPj75Fg9E=; b=Yl4Np3I4tMCQX7vXnbYsa/vtwhMnDZXrAfu5X5wdoYARFoU3qJHQeSpY6BRPWCnDY5 cLPLCQWV+c2AuDqAUTQVp1VPAbstQDcDD8T4GCGwnqw9TWfBC0orCcEhboVYUY3Jicq2 jWE/L7ypffZ6TseLqYri79DdiEiQOkpKSZAxI87Bh2uFtG3vAwoGnOi4qpMa+3BEqrIC IeNcbIjwcWv0JKJNEvZV4xkAS/056f0+QLTDh8nr4EZQ/OMi41LdEygrO31OdT5h3m+L jXkdRQ6HYYsZPFBeQoYwh/N/2KPOgiA2VxLT/HXAXPLtaiy+cLzFSStGb+fx4iqlD24g Tswg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jnyvdjl0S6tXv47TIBBDX6pysa6ADJ0sopDYqbWn9OGmuz5Ps QUoaNxlbXNBrYdRk57ekng0q3HI5jfpDl+X5jhfcNkXBcsjxwDX6qVvme2ZQ3Eim3Kw2zZWiOzH gcy9XG+WTkTrfhLPQEjCdn8YXEngbcBQZVOykmGA83u7NN5RDkjXXd4lLIClscrIIT/WpAtVr X-Received: by 2002:adf:c513:: with SMTP id q19mr13053594wrf.20.1630929011478; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 04:50:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:c513:: with SMTP id q19mr13053567wrf.20.1630929011181; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 04:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.132] (p5b0c6323.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.12.99.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l11sm7891776wrb.15.2021.09.06.04.50.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Sep 2021 04:50:10 -0700 (PDT) To: Miaohe Lin , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210904091839.20270-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_isolation: don't putback unisolated page Message-ID: <5f7c4ac9-d17a-5af3-0326-1152cca38465@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 13:50:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06.09.21 13:32, Miaohe Lin wrote: > On 2021/9/6 17:40, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 04.09.21 11:18, Miaohe Lin wrote: >>> If __isolate_free_page() failed, due to zone watermark check, the page is >>> still on the free list. But this page will be put back to free list again >>> via __putback_isolated_page() now. This may trigger page->flags checks in >>> __free_one_page() if PageReported is set. Or we will corrupt the free list >>> because list_add() will be called for pages already on another list. >>> >>> Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock") >>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin >>> --- >>>   mm/page_isolation.c | 6 ++---- >>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c >>> index 9bb562d5d194..7d70d772525c 100644 >>> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c >>> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c >>> @@ -93,10 +93,8 @@ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, unsigned migratetype) >>>               buddy_pfn = __find_buddy_pfn(pfn, order); >>>               buddy = page + (buddy_pfn - pfn); >>>   -            if (!is_migrate_isolate_page(buddy)) { >>> -                __isolate_free_page(page, order); >>> -                isolated_page = true; >>> -            } >>> +            if (!is_migrate_isolate_page(buddy)) >>> +                isolated_page = !!__isolate_free_page(page, order); >>>           } >>>       } >>> >> >> Shouldn't we much rather force to ignore watermarks here and make sure __isolate_free_page() never fails? > > It seems it is not easy to force to ignore watermarks here. And it's not a problem > if __isolate_free_page() fails because we can do move_freepages_block() anyway. > What do you think? Many thanks. I'm wondering if all this complexity in this function is even required. What about something like this: (completely untested) diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c index bddf788f45bf..29ff2fcb339c 100644 --- a/mm/page_isolation.c +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c @@ -66,12 +66,10 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, unsigned migratetype) { + bool buddy_merge_possible = false; struct zone *zone; unsigned long flags, nr_pages; - bool isolated_page = false; unsigned int order; - unsigned long pfn, buddy_pfn; - struct page *buddy; zone = page_zone(page); spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); @@ -79,26 +77,15 @@ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, unsigned migratetype) goto out; /* - * Because freepage with more than pageblock_order on isolated - * pageblock is restricted to merge due to freepage counting problem, - * it is possible that there is free buddy page. - * move_freepages_block() doesn't care of merge so we need other - * approach in order to merge them. Isolation and free will make - * these pages to be merged. + * If our free page spans at least this whole pageblock and could + * eventually get merged into an even bigger page, go via + * __putback_isolated_page(), because move_freepages_block() won't + * trigger merging of free pages. */ if (PageBuddy(page)) { order = buddy_order(page); - if (order >= pageblock_order && order < MAX_ORDER - 1) { - pfn = page_to_pfn(page); - buddy_pfn = __find_buddy_pfn(pfn, order); - buddy = page + (buddy_pfn - pfn); - - if (pfn_valid_within(buddy_pfn) && - !is_migrate_isolate_page(buddy)) { - __isolate_free_page(page, order); - isolated_page = true; - } - } + if (order >= pageblock_order && order < MAX_ORDER - 1) + buddy_merge_possible = true; } /* @@ -111,12 +98,12 @@ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, unsigned migratetype) * onlining - just onlined memory won't immediately be considered for * allocation. */ - if (!isolated_page) { + if (!buddy_merge_possible) { nr_pages = move_freepages_block(zone, page, migratetype, NULL); __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, nr_pages, migratetype); } set_pageblock_migratetype(page, migratetype); - if (isolated_page) + if (buddy_merge_possible) __putback_isolated_page(page, order, migratetype); zone->nr_isolate_pageblock--; out: -- Thanks, David / dhildenb