Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:20:10 +0100
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/33] SLUB: reduce irq disabled scope and make it RT
 compatible
Message-ID: <20210907082010.GB3959@techsingularity.net>
References: <20210904105003.11688-1-vbabka@suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210904105003.11688-1-vbabka@suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 12:49:30PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The RFC/v1 version also got basic performance screening by Mel that didn't show
> major regressions. Mike's testing with hackbench of v2 on !RT reported
> negligible differences [6]:
> 

FWIW, this version didn't show any major differences in terms of
performance and it didn't functionally fail either.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs