Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: ti: iot2050: Flip mmc device ordering on
 Advanced devices
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc:     Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Bao Cheng Su <baocheng.su@siemens.com>,
        Chao Zeng <chao.zeng@siemens.com>
References: <cover.1631024536.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
 <8e2e435ef67868cb98382b44c51ddb5c8d045d66.1631024536.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
 <20210907151301.7fqwmc7hmcyhhybv@carve>
From:   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Message-ID: <35e0cadf-526c-6402-fb8e-8cdb8b7a0bfe@siemens.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:20:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210907151301.7fqwmc7hmcyhhybv@carve>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 07.09.21 17:13, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 16:22-20210907, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>
>> This ensures that the SD card will remain mmc0 across Basic and Advanced
>> devices, also avoiding surprises for users coming from the downstream
>> kernels.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts
>> index ec9617c13cdb..d1d5278e0b94 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts
>> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ / {
>>  	compatible = "siemens,iot2050-advanced", "ti,am654";
>>  	model = "SIMATIC IOT2050 Advanced";
>>  
>> +	aliases {
>> +		mmc0 = &sdhci1;
>> +		mmc1 = &sdhci0;
>> +	};
> 
> 
> Should we do this at SoC level?
> 

Well, I wouldn't mind - but that would also impact your EVMs. For us,
this is fine as we are coming from that ordering above with our
downstream kernel/dts.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux