Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210902172404.3517626-1-daeho43@gmail.com> <9ab17089-accc-c3a3-a5dc-007fc4eeaa20@kernel.org>
 <CACOAw_yovM592K3-2fQzA6M29XqWu8s_2f+zXawKo-QpNSXq0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <8f8e4695-4062-60c4-0f91-2a1f6a5b0a11@kernel.org> <CACOAw_yBYZzUVGV-A7K57zqrcAaZv7nFSk9mSj9AC6jTTeU7Vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <f64cb941-2bb7-eed2-732d-c9537f46f67c@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <f64cb941-2bb7-eed2-732d-c9537f46f67c@kernel.org>
From:   Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:12:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CACOAw_zxq=SX0OdXV77HyFytJc6aCMbYuS6KZAR_JoQeGZ26Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: introduce fragment allocation mode
 mount option
To:     Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com,
        Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:45 PM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2021/9/4 12:40, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> >> As a per curseg field.
> >>
> >>> Maybe, we run into the same race condition issue you told before for
> >>> fragment_remained_chunk.
> >>> Could you clarify this more?
> >>
> >> e.g.
> >>
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode = FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_FIXED_BLK
> >> fragment_chunk_size = 384
> >> fragment_hole_size = 384
> >>
> >> When creating hole:
> >>
> >> - f2fs_allocate_data_block
> >>    - __refresh_next_blkoff
> >>      chunk locates in [0, 383] of current segment
> >>      seg->next_blkoff = 384
> >>      sbi->fragment_remained_chunk = 0
> >>      then we will reset sbi->fragment_remained_chunk to 384
> >>      and move seg->next_blkoff forward to 768 (384 + 384)
> >>    - __has_curseg_space() returns false
> >>    - allocate_segment() allocates new current segment
> >>
> >> So, for such case that hole may cross two segments, hole size may be truncated
> >> to left size of previous segment.
> >
> > First, sbi->fragment_remained_chunk should be seg->fragment_remained_chunk.
>
> Oh, correct.
>
> > I understand what you mean, so you mean we need to take the leftover
> > "hole" size over to the next segment?
> > In the example, the leftover hole size will be (384 - (512-384)). Do
> > you want to take this over to the next segment?
>
> Yes, the left 256 block-sized hole should be created before next chunk
> in next opened segment.
>

Chao,

Do you have any decent idea to pass the left hole size to the next
segment which will be allocated?

Thanks,

> Thanks,
>
> >