Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:eb17:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hx23csp4005217pxb; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 12:24:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjhQ9W9F6a2YWK9LliXduq3ddV3qH/eHhzDL5g+YhB2IZdimT8VQX9Ou9u4B3Sg4kr+3JN X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8711:: with SMTP id y17mr15112457ioj.16.1631042646690; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:24:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631042646; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Xuga86HLYWbvbn5hE+bFL5a3+GVao9JWXGKcB97L2IDWsywgUcKqYsCaHIBizg73DF NBQOJfXbhkH7RodDSlfj21p+lgKOTwRuHIYMplXBTCt+hv/ifX6ciN21rKRmN22NAyI/ zKzC5KqdqNQHlm2PfpHWlqOaLzPgzOAqkNFbRhV+65ERZzGdbawES/oIB9o1A2kvlPmW /o/yk5QR0VNhrs16N4k2nUAkkV+LOg5J9DelVqELb1n3bR9RLTVgSHKJeznCJv0jIyZA DWU/yac7EkdMMsM9t+cKdq3Re+SvI3cpfiyKR2rAxo9F3R9ArBDICZkHyHlCZaY17C7a A4kA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=p9JsnFkhxJbanYlqcRrjBh1TT6W7qKuzwQh9IXe1IrU=; b=pJMkWyzpBZewAB39K9FXrPcb63NE7MgNvb26uSYJB2aHB2z4Q/Fc+cMUSDQpyf6Z1Q xZBpyqh3pGI/mc7LUPtB7R71YPHgDWCBm37bABAeYKq5lnArLCqHi1ZefZRcuyrw1xSo VP5Razul89OlQCbWSyvup+l2fnnAnzYyXPp2Bf5+aG3R29J+Frrg5uVWLsRLR+54TZkk GQwMbJF74//dn+QdrXluLta+KwWpcIhgJDOd0ZSpKmQA5rDIjCCoNuVqasScMxdPZ+6r 3RshFK7yV6sv1bXdFPMIwcvQrwatNY0xGTLPh9x02GIyrVzF7D7Erq3YvLgX9TIqKt7V qGww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z3si11153524iln.95.2021.09.07.12.23.54; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345710AbhIGSLj (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:11:39 -0400 Received: from mail.zeus.flokli.de ([88.198.15.28]:35206 "EHLO zeus.flokli.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345652AbhIGSLi (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:11:38 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 524 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 14:11:38 EDT Received: from localhost (unknown [95.179.247.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: flokli@flokli.de) by zeus.flokli.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E7771191266; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:01:44 +0200 From: Florian Klink To: Jan Kiszka Cc: "Kumar, M Chetan" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Netdev List , linuxwwan@intel.com Subject: Re: wwan/iosm vs. xmm7360 Message-ID: <20210907180144.c2jakttbigc5x7dm@tp> References: <0545a78f-63f0-f8dd-abdb-1887c65e1c79@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21-08-06 11:41:27, Jan Kiszka wrote: >On 06.08.21 11:29, Kumar, M Chetan wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> >> What is the context of this request ? > >The context is that there are many folks out there (me included - Lenovo >P52) with devices that have the xmm-7360 built-in, can't switch it to >USB mode (prevented by OEM), and currently require [1]. That kind of >works but is not really the final solution. So I also kicked off [2] there. It also seems the 7560 card doesn't show up in my X13 AMD (Gen 1) at all - so even if I'd "upgrade" that card, I couldn't use it. >I know. I'm not an expert on the details, but reading the overall >architectures of the IOSM and what has been reverse-engineered for the >7360, there seem to be some similarities. So, maybe you can explain to >the community if that is a reasonable path to upstream 7360 support, or >if at least the pattern of the 7560 could/should be transferred to the >7360 driver. Very curious about this as well - they might share some code at lest, if not even the driver? Regards, Florian > >Thanks, >Jan > >[2] https://github.com/xmm7360/xmm7360-pci/issues/104 > >> >> Regards, >> Chetan >> >> On 8/6/2021 2:09 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Hi Chetan, >>> >>> at the risk of having missed this being answered already: >>> >>> How close is the older xmm7360 to the now supported xmm7560 in mainline? >>> >>> There is that reverse engineered PCI driver [1] with non-standard >>> userland interface, and it would obviously be great to benefit from >>> common infrastructure and specifically the modem-manager compatible >>> interface. Is this realistic to achieve for the 7360, or is that >>> hardware or its firmware too different? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jan >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/xmm7360/xmm7360-pci >>> > >-- >Siemens AG, T RDA IOT >Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- Florian Klink