Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:09:07 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
Message-ID: <20210908090907.74edb3a4@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20210908090720.0748b861@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20210908090720.0748b861@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/+iy5pNjQfZLanJvd1YoNrgy";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/+iy5pNjQfZLanJvd1YoNrgy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:07:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> w=
rote:
>
> Building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (mips
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>=20
> In file included from /kisskb/src/include/linux/compiler_types.h:65:0,
>                  from <command-line>:0:
> include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:29:29: error: "__GCC4_has_attribute__=
_no_sanitize_coverage__" is not defined [-Werror=3Dundef]
>  # define __has_attribute(x) __GCC4_has_attribute_##x
>                              ^
> include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:125:29: note: in expansion of macro '__has_a=
ttribute'
>  #if defined(CONFIG_KCOV) && __has_attribute(__no_sanitize_coverage__)
>                              ^
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>=20
> Caused by commit
>=20
>   540540d06e9d ("kcov: add __no_sanitize_coverage to fix noinstr for all =
architectures")
>=20
> This ia a gcc 4.9 build, so presumably this?
>=20
> diff -ru a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_a=
ttributes.h
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h	2021-09-08 09:03:35.169225661 +=
1000
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h	2021-09-08 09:05:47.790907780 +=
1000
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_profile_instrument_function__ 0
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___nonstring__           0
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_sanitize_address__ 1
> +# define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_sanitize_coverage__	0
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_sanitize_undefined__ 1
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___fallthrough__         0
>  #endif

Just to be clear, I haven't tested the above in any way.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/+iy5pNjQfZLanJvd1YoNrgy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmE38RMACgkQAVBC80lX
0GyQpQf/XWOFr4+uQHNcLr1IWgODsMMXGZy2nUcbLn1NIeNf6agCc5mb1h2kNtvT
7fI9GZniwF6TBwStfeBUN0Zl55YlXUeWhA9Ilg5VmNdAiRZuFWUTXe2iX/StgQln
xbDUfbU9hCmfsb+Zy9/l1OGWMwbFJ5E7s9hc9oCRGpDEv/i13gC7330IEk34PqEA
t1exI4c3QAL++TsozH60aAlkrrMjmXW9mOGrC0mPxNI7C1tlHajUVczHPrFcutnR
p8plz9BKRvT8PedrnStQB3zTfcT3knTKlwYzO7J/Q/htsvWA/3FpEWREAX4VKFcb
yUb9rAIgxaT6R1TDv+bg/aXomdYIjQ==
=SM5C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/+iy5pNjQfZLanJvd1YoNrgy--