Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:eb17:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hx23csp52049pxb; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:29:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyl/ejdWh976w5H3rqUq7LfVU2lX7Vn/5+OoSZBzVcsxokxOFofdqrGJtTmK6oIh2gMwG0f X-Received: by 2002:a6b:fd05:: with SMTP id c5mr830755ioi.102.1631060958785; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 17:29:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631060958; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VEK7K1+Osf6/NT7QMyVK9IJZZOibKPBAE117z+79LHg+ioE1or9wySwPXKQApXEdRZ BFW8BWA61RO/jD6aJEJYSsuTSMw9JbYstILgpSAYLu1sVRhXG4Q6UZ1QAlzpYRKcvwKG sZ05asepc/ijDXJmuZU0+Ok5A7RJp04/A+lHXAYNS1wCj5PI260nBw4079HatAAhyvkX MmYb6YLHQ4+dL47w9UzI2WmwsZPmq+AQsgGTZB5wQ6pxFk6MlC+37pc/jFacfCD/20Vr lVNlRG70x43obpmkJkUP4FOKW2O6s++85rvNTdtRLqgakyVNM+8cL+aBb5BM4ADOP98Z WFlw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=2fCvjHDf9KGIiGHjDCefyCqJZ5JZISjuKfKdmD//avU=; b=eQVdOpFwKmwzZ3N0oLU0/b168D/PUW3vFCGkfz2tIpSxhmf96zEylnz4fkzdYfJo4M xn2ssxGMrsW4q2vrBpP68Mihh4al85yVHmGWPMwsqD9dsrHBudJsGp73M49+wYi9/caJ vaxfgRO8dM4gjVF+grkPNBTdIfV85huH0F8+kp8xIeVhuiAIOviyoFO7W5BMndnqnhmX tG9MvB2or9cqqjoOFxKU4K4P4WkMb4v1q1SNzgP1O+vOOJiXh1yGvh4w5kaaygJJ6hfp nWEDmsqZZw69sk5Xxe+DLDCJKHFhrZhmxT8vQ6hKs0aAgbOBB7fNnHFcHHiujcJgtN9e p0jA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=BhyC1yVO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r13si467909jac.86.2021.09.07.17.28.42; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 17:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=BhyC1yVO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241594AbhIHAIu (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:08:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34562 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234396AbhIHAIt (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:08:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E086C061757 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id n18so586907pgm.12 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 17:07:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2fCvjHDf9KGIiGHjDCefyCqJZ5JZISjuKfKdmD//avU=; b=BhyC1yVOHW/h10hVsNbRrSm8Ej1gHTMXX3iTFQQq2GUHF3Sr9D00KCqQrC5WTFUBA9 QZ7YbIdb4oMafCvO03W8iEql06DV0W9RQ19EFnI3QNalMG4vLxzOVP5ur/YzkRKgmx/P mp+bM+/D8YTYoQ3/vKJQgTh/bsbpcFzDPB7rQ474CACwSGXCDotzR2NG7S56V74vEdQE tqlIpGq+kOkp2Iox/k0pq6QKYAmFj5I1lCr3m4pscUPyCte/gnIloD/E8d9LsimXC4y4 iuyqAqNebZwr0uBN8E5sxnjnTq85ZXpyRiVIcqGpVtQhtvg/4aBR3s0Rg/DI2bzLtz6P 3CFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2fCvjHDf9KGIiGHjDCefyCqJZ5JZISjuKfKdmD//avU=; b=kXPtar1z7+8+TPDRGQfy/LY65WstIKxZZ8NHtPKSgs1MNlwDrEPeg5Yhz21yqweMux 9KGmQEMWAPOtLpTaPtVbv+o8/anhYyOPJpufpP0WCBLQR54VuOwAkUsziJQmHa+7jFN3 MA5Ce/hwPFdEyL973USWZ5+FOllD83PTD8sn87YbtnKQDoFIaQ53RZr0FcDmGggtkgSh ZQYI0LmDsuQg+0A01liOhYzHEueAfncI8Khlfg0M3tWFMteV6v9C/gJZ0ialWQNqD3Rs I/x+zbSXB/6K36WV7x9OFSU5Yjm09yY2ZuiuMX6uLu0dOFcBBB2C5K5NfznZlQRZaSi6 Zsxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RgJVlqfdFX3GvZiY4PERpfQ3Oq/gBB/FBE28Rs2mUzvFUISxv vb91qz/J06B58tUFQiFSaXuRFw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:c045:: with SMTP id z5mr896214pgi.374.1631059662344; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 17:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u7sm159614pjn.45.2021.09.07.17.07.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 17:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 00:07:38 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Zhenzhong Duan Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix a TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR field mask issue Message-ID: References: <20210906014323.170235-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210906014323.170235-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 06, 2021, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > Host value of TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR field should be unchangable by guest, > but the mask for this purpose is set to a wrong value. So it doesn't > take effect. It would be helpful to provide a bit more info as to just how bad/boneheaded this bug is. E.g. When updating the host's mask for its MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL user return entry, clear the mask in the found uret MSR instead of vmx->guest_uret_msrs[i]. Modifying guest_uret_msrs directly is completely broken as 'i' does not point at the MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL entry. In fact, it's guaranteed to be an out-of-bounds accesses as is always set to kvm_nr_uret_msrs in a prior loop. By sheer dumb luck, the fallout is limited to "only" failing to preserve the host's TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR. The out-of-bounds access is benign as it's guaranteed to clear a bit in a guest MSR value, which are always zero at vCPU creation on both x86-64 and i386. > Fixes: 8ea8b8d6f869 ("KVM: VMX: Use common x86's uret MSR list as the one true list") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > index 927a552393b9..36588b5feee6 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -6812,7 +6812,7 @@ static int vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > */ > tsx_ctrl = vmx_find_uret_msr(vmx, MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL); > if (tsx_ctrl) > - vmx->guest_uret_msrs[i].mask = ~(u64)TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR; > + tsx_ctrl->mask = ~(u64)TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR; Egad, that's a horrific oversight on my part. Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson