Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 9 Sep 2021 11:16:25 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
        kim.phillips@amd.com, namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/13] perf/x86/core: add idle hooks
Message-ID: <YTnQ6Wxoz8LYmtPS@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20210909075700.4025355-1-eranian@google.com>
 <20210909075700.4025355-9-eranian@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210909075700.4025355-9-eranian@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:56:55AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index 14ce130aee1b..c0ddc3c32a33 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,6 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>  	 */
>  	if (need_resched()) {
>  		local_irq_enable();
> -		perf_lopwr_cb(false);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -230,6 +229,9 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>  		tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
>  
>  		next_state = cpuidle_find_deepest_state(drv, dev, max_latency_ns);
> +		if (!cpu_idle_force_poll)
> +			perf_lopwr_cb(true);
> +
>  		call_cpuidle(drv, dev, next_state);
>  	} else {
>  		bool stop_tick = true;
> @@ -244,12 +246,17 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>  		else
>  			tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick();
>  
> +		if (!cpu_idle_force_poll)
> +			perf_lopwr_cb(true);
> +
>  		entered_state = call_cpuidle(drv, dev, next_state);
>  		/*
>  		 * Give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome
>  		 */
>  		cpuidle_reflect(dev, entered_state);
>  	}
> +	if (!cpu_idle_force_poll)
> +		perf_lopwr_cb(false);
>  
>  exit_idle:
>  	__current_set_polling();
> @@ -259,7 +266,6 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>  	 */
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled())) {
>  		local_irq_enable();
> -		perf_lopwr_cb(false);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -293,8 +299,6 @@ static void do_idle(void)
>  	while (!need_resched()) {
>  		rmb();
>  
> -		perf_lopwr_cb(true);
> -
>  		local_irq_disable();
>  
>  		if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) {

Why are you sendimg me a patch that undoes most of what the previous
patch does? That's just bad form.