Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 9 Sep 2021 12:20:46 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 15/19] iomap: Support partial direct I/O on user copy
 failures
Message-ID: <YTnuDhNlSN1Ie1MJ@infradead.org>
References: <20210827164926.1726765-1-agruenba@redhat.com>
 <20210827164926.1726765-16-agruenba@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210827164926.1726765-16-agruenba@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 06:49:22PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> In iomap_dio_rw, when iomap_apply returns an -EFAULT error and the
> IOMAP_DIO_PARTIAL flag is set, complete the request synchronously and
> return a partial result.  This allows the caller to deal with the page
> fault and retry the remainder of the request.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/direct-io.c  | 6 ++++++
>  include/linux/iomap.h | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index 8054f5d6c273..ba88fe51b77a 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -561,6 +561,12 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>  		ret = iomap_apply(inode, pos, count, iomap_flags, ops, dio,
>  				iomap_dio_actor);
>  		if (ret <= 0) {
> +			if (ret == -EFAULT && dio->size &&
> +			    (dio_flags & IOMAP_DIO_PARTIAL)) {
> +				wait_for_completion = true;
> +				ret = 0;

Do we need a NOWAIT check here to skip the wait_for_completion
for that case?