Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:eb17:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hx23csp483288pxb; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 05:35:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvu58VLxVVipMbBJh6TE84tJLLqn3AyBTDgZ+w7vmU3H2Popo+cZzugjU4FUomyC22gEeb X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9ada:: with SMTP id x26mr2518187ion.50.1631190929279; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 05:35:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631190929; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bwUX/Pt3SdkVTEAlJvZftVMGiA3XCM37K1KNuhGZsGGRsEyWIbGAGI1gk5hO1IWSZP R8VnnFaOWgFO3kE/VMYEZVu6Wp8OLI6LO6QnFJeUuLnFBdiE94XFy+qSetsokdeUTwsf 7ZJgH8qBsT2OULJp5N2DjO+SMBCMzOSq8UoWbXx9ZZ1wFx3fB+f5KSlJmK8ICjF6KBHJ ujk5Aoq9apWxINXTeDTKQWDoCd0n844Q/V4w+wjeu4CPLmVCLbeFiu34Eo27TytWfDbq 3JKM3mj0PfNyB3Hws85YRJuy5ekymJSMHjHOw5UfMTZPdn2/bZrmoF/IODdUfqjSMS/7 CjWw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=LZboBmqJolJq4zSNXCld9rDZmbAGQmQ0NMhaGYyg9no=; b=Z0fXQmK2tIl5Q9M/ucIToP1XZSRTUX1hBXuwc2Vj6QQ8shklsldCDn4163q2obXrnv TTdDjGT5uaHEvg+EU65qhCGzD5QVg0JIKP3vKOnRtp4l12PcNtZQ6jluTX9vA1AfNIk0 HcrGjG3pjJF2cGU6PkikM7jm//nm6/4nRTrU7XmL82MoiW/lp8mSBIk7zUqkaa91uEio Sp0b9UyBXSxi5S0saSIusICCiAPK7Begoc6+zM/BUK8x5EEPY7HzaFw9Z7fEdwWLWkHj IW3m9r/OPIJ845NESbT4aSKiyLppyGuwT3+MCTwTsfas7/citNXpYBEu0LTKakj/9RgO v7+w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l20si1797983jaj.132.2021.09.09.05.35.17; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 05:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1354308AbhIIMfO (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Sep 2021 08:35:14 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:12213 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1353561AbhIIM1G (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2021 08:27:06 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10101"; a="220821248" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,280,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="220821248" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2021 05:13:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,280,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="606805082" Received: from kuha.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.162]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 09 Sep 2021 05:13:44 -0700 Received: by kuha.fi.intel.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 09 Sep 2021 15:13:43 +0300 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:13:43 +0300 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Laurentiu Tudor Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Andy Shevchenko , Jon Nettleton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: balance refcount for managed sw nodes Message-ID: References: <20210716101602.1891-1-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> <2a0f7fa6-b164-eeb4-118a-acd57d79a484@nxp.com> <2485ac73-6df6-3939-5ee5-ef650d951054@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2485ac73-6df6-3939-5ee5-ef650d951054@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:59:18PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > > > On 7/26/2021 10:59 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > > > > > > On 7/20/2021 1:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:22 PM Laurentiu Tudor > >> wrote: > >>> On 7/19/2021 3:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 03:00:17PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > >>>>> On 7/16/2021 8:21 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote: > >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 2:17 PM Andy Shevchenko > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 01:16:02PM +0300, laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com wrote: > >>>>>>>> From: Laurentiu Tudor > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> software_node_notify(), on KOBJ_REMOVE drops the refcount twice on managed > >>>>>>>> software nodes, thus leading to underflow errors. Balance the refcount by > >>>>>>>> bumping it in the device_create_managed_software_node() function. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The error [1] was encountered after adding a .shutdown() op to our > >>>>>>>> fsl-mc-bus driver. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Looking into the history of adding ->shutdown() to dwc3 driver (it got reverted > >>>>>>> later on), I can tell that probably something is wrong in the ->shutdown() > >>>>>>> method itself. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Isn't the other alternative to just remove the second kobject_put from > >>>>>> KOBJ_REMOVE ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Or maybe on top of Heikki's suggestion, replace the calls to > >>>>> sysfs_create_link() from KOBJ_ADD with sysfs_create_link_nowarn()? > >>>> > >>>> _noearn will hide the problem. It was there, it was removed from there. > >>>> Perhaps we have to understand the root cause better (some specific flow?). > >>>> > >>>> Any insight from you on the flow when the issue appears? I.o.w. what happened > >>>> on the big picture that we got into the warning you see? > >>> > >>> I encountered the initial issue when trying to shut down a system booted > >>> with ACPI but only after adding a .shutdown() callback to our bus driver > >>> so that the devices are properly taken down. The problem was that > >>> software_node_notify(), on KOBJ_REMOVE was dropping the reference count > >>> twice leading to an underflow error. My initial proposal was to just > >>> bump the refcount in device_create_managed_software_node(). The device > >>> properties that triggered the problem are created here [1]. > >>> > >>> Heikko suggested that instead of manually incrementing the refcount to > >>> use software_node_notify(KOBJ_ADD). This triggered the second issue, a > >>> duplicated sysfs entry warning originating in the usb subsystem: > >>> device_create_managed_software_node() ends up being called twice, once > >>> here [2] and secondly, the place I previous mentioned [1]. > >> > >> This [3] is what I have reported against DWC3 when ->shutdown() has > >> been added there. And here [4] is another thread about the issue with > >> that callback. The ->release() callback is called at put_device() [5] > >> and ->shutdown() is called before that [6]. That said, can you inspect > >> your ->shutdown() implementation once more time and perhaps see if > >> there is anything that can be amended? > >> > > > > Will do, thanks for the pointers. It could be that we mess something out > > in how we use the driver model. > > > > Quick (and late, sorry) update from my side. I've spent time on > debugging our bus, did found some issues but, at least for now, none are > related to sw node. > In the mean time, I noticed in the swnode code that > device_add_software_node() calls software_node_notify(KOBJ_ADD) while > device_create_managed_software_node() doesn't. Updating [1] the later > with the call to software_node_notify(KOBJ_ADD) does seem to fix the > issue I'm seeing. > > Could this be a problem? Any comments appreciated. > > One more thing perhaps worth mentioning is that, at least for now, there > are few uses for this device_create_managed_software_node() api, > mentioning here a couple of them: > - arm64 iort code - this seems to be triggering the issue i'm getting > - dwc3 usb - Andy reported similar issues here, maybe the issue is common? > > [1] > @@ -1113,6 +1125,15 @@ int device_create_managed_software_node(struct > device *dev, > to_swnode(fwnode)->managed = true; > set_secondary_fwnode(dev, fwnode); > > + /* > + * If the device has been fully registered by the time this > function is > + * called, software_node_notify() must be called separately so > that the > + * symlinks get created and the reference count of the node is > kept in > + * balance. > + */ > + if (device_is_registered(dev)) > + software_node_notify(dev, KOBJ_ADD); > + > return 0; > } That should be fixed indeed. Please send that after -rc1 is out. thanks, -- heikki