Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:16:27 +0300
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To:     Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: balance refcount for managed sw nodes
Message-ID: <YTn7G/Mgm18JfV9k@kuha.fi.intel.com>
References: <20210716101602.1891-1-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
 <YPF40t5bhgTFM2wK@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CABdtJHuKyybhJazpAc8KT54ELtZ319rdb6CbSH6zB5x3NhgtAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <bb009f85-687e-d560-9cc5-1ac4f586a6bd@nxp.com>
 <YPVufjevu5WaaIxQ@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <2a0f7fa6-b164-eeb4-118a-acd57d79a484@nxp.com>
 <CAHp75VcYt+VQq4jp9JdkA4EpGqtks2sP-NRkfSbGj+-Vn5ke=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <c2186f2c-8be0-6f44-e442-8cb8cbd5f2c2@nxp.com>
 <2485ac73-6df6-3939-5ee5-ef650d951054@nxp.com>
 <YTn6dx2rRsLZ6GDJ@kuha.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YTn6dx2rRsLZ6GDJ@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:13:47PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:59:18PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 7/26/2021 10:59 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 7/20/2021 1:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:22 PM Laurentiu Tudor
> > >> <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> wrote:
> > >>> On 7/19/2021 3:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 03:00:17PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > >>>>> On 7/16/2021 8:21 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 2:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > >>>>>> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 01:16:02PM +0300, laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> software_node_notify(), on KOBJ_REMOVE drops the refcount twice on managed
> > >>>>>>>> software nodes, thus leading to underflow errors. Balance the refcount by
> > >>>>>>>> bumping it in the device_create_managed_software_node() function.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> The error [1] was encountered after adding a .shutdown() op to our
> > >>>>>>>> fsl-mc-bus driver.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Looking into the history of adding ->shutdown() to dwc3 driver (it got reverted
> > >>>>>>> later on), I can tell that probably something is wrong in the ->shutdown()
> > >>>>>>> method itself.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Isn't the other alternative to just remove the second kobject_put from
> > >>>>>> KOBJ_REMOVE ?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Or maybe on top of Heikki's suggestion, replace the calls to
> > >>>>> sysfs_create_link() from KOBJ_ADD with sysfs_create_link_nowarn()?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _noearn will hide the problem. It was there, it was removed from there.
> > >>>> Perhaps we have to understand the root cause better (some specific flow?).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Any insight from you on the flow when the issue appears? I.o.w. what happened
> > >>>> on the big picture that we got into the warning you see?
> > >>>
> > >>> I encountered the initial issue when trying to shut down a system booted
> > >>> with ACPI but only after adding a .shutdown() callback to our bus driver
> > >>> so that the devices are properly taken down. The problem was that
> > >>> software_node_notify(), on KOBJ_REMOVE was dropping the reference count
> > >>> twice leading to an underflow error. My initial proposal was to just
> > >>> bump the refcount in device_create_managed_software_node(). The device
> > >>> properties that triggered the problem are created here [1].
> > >>>
> > >>> Heikko suggested that instead of manually incrementing the refcount to
> > >>> use software_node_notify(KOBJ_ADD). This triggered the second issue, a
> > >>> duplicated sysfs entry warning originating in the usb subsystem:
> > >>> device_create_managed_software_node() ends up being called twice, once
> > >>> here [2] and secondly, the place I previous mentioned [1].
> > >>
> > >> This [3] is what I have reported against DWC3 when ->shutdown() has
> > >> been added there. And here [4] is another thread about the issue with
> > >> that callback. The ->release() callback is called at put_device() [5]
> > >> and ->shutdown() is called before that [6]. That said, can you inspect
> > >> your ->shutdown() implementation once more time and perhaps see if
> > >> there is anything that can be amended?
> > >>
> > > 
> > > Will do, thanks for the pointers. It could be that we mess something out
> > > in how we use the driver model.
> > > 
> > 
> > Quick (and late, sorry) update from my side. I've spent time on
> > debugging our bus, did found some issues but, at least for now, none are
> > related to sw node.
> > In the mean time, I noticed in the swnode code that
> > device_add_software_node() calls software_node_notify(KOBJ_ADD) while
> > device_create_managed_software_node() doesn't. Updating [1] the later
> > with the call to software_node_notify(KOBJ_ADD) does seem to fix the
> > issue I'm seeing.
> > 
> > Could this be a problem? Any comments appreciated.
> > 
> > One more thing perhaps worth mentioning is that, at least for now, there
> > are few uses for this device_create_managed_software_node() api,
> > mentioning here a couple of them:
> >  - arm64 iort code - this seems to be triggering the issue i'm getting
> >  - dwc3 usb - Andy reported similar issues here, maybe the issue is common?
> > 
> > [1]
> > @@ -1113,6 +1125,15 @@ int device_create_managed_software_node(struct
> > device *dev,
> >         to_swnode(fwnode)->managed = true;
> >         set_secondary_fwnode(dev, fwnode);
> > 
> > +       /*
> > +        * If the device has been fully registered by the time this
> > function is
> > +        * called, software_node_notify() must be called separately so
> > that the
> > +        * symlinks get created and the reference count of the node is
> > kept in
> > +        * balance.
> > +        */
> > +       if (device_is_registered(dev))
> > +               software_node_notify(dev, KOBJ_ADD);
> > +
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> 
> That should be fixed indeed. Please send that after -rc1 is out.

I mean, resend :-)


-- 
heikki