Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: fallback for lack of xdp tx queues
To:     =?UTF-8?B?w43DsWlnbyBIdWd1ZXQ=?= <ihuguet@redhat.com>,
        habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc:     ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org,
        john.fastabend@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210909092846.18217-1-ihuguet@redhat.com>
From:   Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5233eedf-42a7-f938-67cd-e7acc5f3bbce@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:39:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210909092846.18217-1-ihuguet@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 09/09/2021 10:28, Íñigo Huguet wrote:
> Íñigo Huguet (2):
>   sfc: fallback for lack of xdp tx queues
>   sfc: last resort fallback for lack of xdp tx queues
Patches LGTM, thanks for working on this.

However, I would like to grumble a bit about process: firstly I would
 have thought this was more net-next than net material.
Secondly and more importantly, I would really have liked to have had
 more than 72 minutes to review this before it was applied.  Dave, I
 realise you never sleep, but the rest of us occasionally have to :P

-ed