Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210909092846.18217-1-ihuguet@redhat.com> <5233eedf-42a7-f938-67cd-e7acc5f3bbce@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5233eedf-42a7-f938-67cd-e7acc5f3bbce@gmail.com>
From:   =?UTF-8?B?w43DsWlnbyBIdWd1ZXQ=?= <ihuguet@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:48:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CACT4ouf64jvpjUcmfJ=hc0SjrSGYx4QFL0j6sEitMWi-kjp47A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: fallback for lack of xdp tx queues
To:     Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Cc:     habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, ast@kernel.org,
        daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:39 PM Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Patches LGTM, thanks for working on this.
>
> However, I would like to grumble a bit about process: firstly I would
>  have thought this was more net-next than net material.

I intended to send it for net-next, but by mistake I tagged it as net.
Sorry, my fault.

> Secondly and more importantly, I would really have liked to have had
>  more than 72 minutes to review this before it was applied.  Dave, I
>  realise you never sleep, but the rest of us occasionally have to :P

I go to sleep now too, or at least rest a bit  :-P
--=20
=C3=8D=C3=B1igo Huguet