Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 10 Sep 2021 03:30:48 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     "Modi, Geet" <geet.modi@ti.com>
Cc:     "Nagalla, Hari" <hnagalla@ti.com>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Sharma, Vikram" <vikram.sharma@ti.com>, dmurphy@ti.com
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] net: phy:
 dp83tc811: modify list of interrupts enabled at initialization
Message-ID: <YTq1SATpNvwo+ojg@lunn.ch>
References: <20210902190944.4963-1-hnagalla@ti.com>
 <YTFc6pyEtlRO/4r/@lunn.ch>
 <99232B33-1C2F-45AF-A259-0868AC7D3FBC@ti.com>
 <YTdxBMVeqZVyO4Tf@lunn.ch>
 <E61A9519-DBA6-4931-A2A0-78856819C362@ti.com>
 <YTpwjWEUmJWo0mwr@lunn.ch>
 <E3DBDC45-111F-4744-82A8-95C7D5CCEBE5@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E3DBDC45-111F-4744-82A8-95C7D5CCEBE5@ti.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:41:53AM +0000, Modi, Geet wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> As mentioned we want to do this in phases: 
> a) this patch to disable the Overvoltage driver interrupt
> b) After carefully considering other interrupts, plan a  follow-on patch to take care of other interrupts.

I still don't get it. Why just Over volt now and not the rest, which
are equally useless? It makes me think there is something seriously
wrong with over voltage, which you are not telling us about. Maybe an
interrupt storm? If there is something broken here, this patch needs
to be back ported to stable.

   Andrew