Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:eb17:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hx23csp1651528pxb; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:29:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSyes+qIfCcvHmBvRZBy0l6+OdGTCEclKcy0oVDZJSmG6K4idc6ua6naCUDLm1yqhVg0cx X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1846:: with SMTP id b6mr6881045ilv.264.1631294973282; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:29:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631294973; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dxrq2R3aa2/bFo4X8q9ZAUzR3lCwfVKbgpURYCO6pyx7AfAFXBVfqKh0HqsRnCB3wN jTBiOYUIwUkJ6GG94rS1ISmTLNvgFAk84OLzfCoi3yC4/FjWDjU5dKS7MKnHZepIXRRp IY112pS4nlKh0zZCVlDKcrWPQRLbnomHPbGm90rvHQG6nJtu/oVTRLmyzDrOQanEZPcC mIMMjMy1P0ncPuGsr7+8bwsEqXl3LfQMGaIVnScNKS9czWKyeJVMn2sX+GmE3wWc1Fq6 l0ZNDspZc/+IOyyzazYutyjP9ImW6zVrlvhzE2mLPb7UE91CpXZxZJNtoQmbG7eMclW0 4B0w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=BhHuc7Cjlx8Uws6mK4+1ThnTH6hFaC10ASuiWh5hFCE=; b=QihozP97dRWHMZi4wUGcjFZHre16MwFIy844icsRX0y6V6qEe4he47Eqs+G5yXoAcc OkBR/wjOCFKQlPjagH5g8WcOs616QLThuQd7/FN1Yb14SpqeC9Bm3BbpdrQkSAtdIEOs +MNmiP5xGyKSyvbm+JHJJHPSBCaTlnkMtNirCJqAwJhYaAK7JYQ5jUcesqldV4vEbqTW vEMDxCMtev24uZWzfqZbfrNDlmC5QHCQy4EAvCR/5wjPEX7N40FOcUZ8Js4m4kw0cktm zB9418v+DUESD5yF31KJzy2Ky2uuLj9TKSZLhsuQhpvxwEOT1jRYEiPdTGgXg7YGP9cQ s2eA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=qv45Ea7v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k7si5456337ior.112.2021.09.10.10.29.21; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=qv45Ea7v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231751AbhIJR3v (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 13:29:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41650 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229664AbhIJR3o (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 13:29:44 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D1DC061574; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id g14so4371018ljk.5; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:28:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=BhHuc7Cjlx8Uws6mK4+1ThnTH6hFaC10ASuiWh5hFCE=; b=qv45Ea7vxtjrefJIVv+WLaFopsIDKTCxymXO09US5GHfhMRQuyrbFRdu6vsgzmw8DP AL1gl3Ueh2BU2Ns4o19SrnIgkBGL43SA4oKjCr6rAEtY7tPHLCWlsj+z7PgYw05gJB8r rsBZP54+dj/W8RN2lWD6b39zTUX3uu1zRfkJJtG7SAkU/Qp8AmMU511lkzog97/WhFmv 65u3Aoxbld2gAfBEW7LjS7MytBgCyIYt0voqfUshYcUSFZsA6eZcXkNJxy0AOQTkdYXb htqz9ndrBQR8HJI3Yex9KbVJD+18E/A0HCDdg6N8oycPTE6y0I3PvyQ0RLhcLqHXqxPC sonw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=BhHuc7Cjlx8Uws6mK4+1ThnTH6hFaC10ASuiWh5hFCE=; b=TwMJUracyfEzeZK61n0hXEkGNfVFAZ5tV6WcQfxRl9kIazgy6Avf7p/XwZ4rXh2+BB GWH5xLWcXK90SzmqsTgMdL4oMMdwik/rTdxg3m0hisKN2zLK90hWvVZlQeLeckZRZ6k9 rI8STtF6rPGJnQfGdmLfndsiVy+qx7bMZ8WllKceWrhR1v2eMECVJtDazpp0XXAbWjmX LhHTqDiGYcA7UB+QXC0RgtwqIMu6ICLsmM8I7nSkW80Icxj6UXNln+dqt6oGTcc0yZcX 4d0TDJfwN+4IntL3huSGP3QNQn52qhzk5ZivX+rCQgdS21hrDL2bYbxPLUUSTxMGl412 TGZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530I7syzFYaUN+V2nyMJrsKEmwdc1Y//hZwdDySqWHQCuRG16ENO d7dgSr4a3mxqPnX6bFgyKUwJSenB8yCZeQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8511:: with SMTP id j17mr4954431lji.407.1631294911915; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kari-VirtualBox ([31.132.12.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t11sm614979lfc.54.2021.09.10.10.28.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 20:28:29 +0300 From: Kari Argillander To: =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Pouiller Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kalle Valo , "David S . Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/31] staging: wfx: indent functions arguments Message-ID: <20210910172829.3ulrvnl7d5kz43wt@kari-VirtualBox> References: <20210910160504.1794332-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com> <20210910160504.1794332-32-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com> <20210910165743.jm7ssqak7gouyl5j@kari-VirtualBox> <2462401.Ex1rHSgKji@pc-42> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2462401.Ex1rHSgKji@pc-42> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:12:28PM +0200, J?r?me Pouiller wrote: > On Friday 10 September 2021 18:57:43 CEST Kari Argillander wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 06:05:04PM +0200, Jerome Pouiller wrote: > > > From: J?r?me Pouiller > > > > > > Function arguments must be aligned with left parenthesis. Apply that > > > rule. > > > > To my eyes something still go wrong with this patch. Might be my email > > fault, but every other patch looks ok. Now these are too left. > > I don't try anymore to check alignments with my email viewer. The > original patch is as I expect (and I take care to send my patch with > base64 to avoid pitfalls with MS Exchange). So, I think the is correct. It was correct. Nice to now know about that something funny is happening with my part. > > > Also it should alight with first argument not left parenthesis? > > Absolutely. > > > -- > J?r?me Pouiller > >