Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6d25:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gq37csp224052pxb; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:16:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJmeUOFPoIdn1RuQ3hK9oFYQ2hBJQuM7AkPpK/2P+2CxwHV8JAIW37Lo89wGPwvKZOS1y+ X-Received: by 2002:a6b:5a1a:: with SMTP id o26mr1557869iob.40.1631355371194; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:16:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631355371; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r0Ie55h2Z3inS+JXA0ziznxjkOcREcJSLmTHruHvPrqbZObmvzJCtd3AzFVQadWInB eNDdA/eEc1tmfjK/RBc2oKt8GwViQyxY7jqTQ8UlmDD1QPq3b4hhtJ48mS+NLsAiAnAU FBY6sxjMoE0Hj08IyZfFGr88Ka1KNl7zEDBy4gvEj2046BI3GcAXtL3Upk6NSQANrXUT CLCHY7E5osksbBoHqs4zHtyYkhksJcargyVxYqFwdn0TjrtN4dy/HsFynyT33UiFoaA1 2WZyZYBJxipKSSdyHyp2TY6cPfqzvqdbnnXma8iOPl/7hdjmy1qh/qOCV0xmIJboBpEc hmlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=/A6HifqY0XBHEgtokn+sgJHfAquAf+dzzYhRdzlzp7U=; b=v61jpPU2FTvCBjDlOPdHigJNU+ylZWIawqPOm1NK9Gh9zPx9BxWxlq4zOguAlUUsso MOw7k1LkdwEB3s14n2ZxF0fx7pGPp39oboWaNRYZBoC425NrsIW1fQC60QEbUU0z3MB1 D4vmrY2udSsaquQpszwCKVRQA/aq6BPhX9bg79ZDJEj8hC3SNaM4+5HWsre9HAlbRAny o5XZ8v5rwHAm5pQ255/M65lgCKEQtMut/i7XtU5DXqHWedQCyQmk9WMJVUjYQHKdKwJg ZJ/1rzoKOGNFRE+JDL63tom2VB3gsqCM4iUToXFUwrxGY6296ixFUpZSYCw3CuGNAQXW gg7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j14si1080002iok.53.2021.09.11.03.15.59; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235588AbhIKKPj (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 11 Sep 2021 06:15:39 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:45396 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235443AbhIKKPi (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Sep 2021 06:15:38 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D351FB; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lpieralisi (e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.255]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D71D3F5A1; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 03:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:14:18 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Jia He , Will Deacon , Len Brown , Robert Moore , Erik Kaneda , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" , Hanjun Guo , Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Harb Abdulhamid Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "ACPI: Add memory semantics to acpi_os_map_memory()" Message-ID: <20210911101418.GA32028@lpieralisi> References: <20210910122820.26886-1-justin.he@arm.com> <20210910143223.6705-1-justin.he@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:28:49PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 16:32, Jia He wrote: > > > > This reverts commit 437b38c51162f8b87beb28a833c4d5dc85fa864e. > > > > After this commit, a boot panic is alway hit on an Ampere EMAG server > > with call trace as follows: > > Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000410 [#1] SMP > > Modules linked in: > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0+ #462 > > Hardware name: MiTAC RAPTOR EV-883832-X3-0001/RAPTOR, BIOS 0.14 02/22/2019 > > pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > > [...snip...] > > Call trace: > > acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler+0x26c/0x2c8 > > acpi_ev_address_space_dispatch+0x228/0x2c4 > > acpi_ex_access_region+0x114/0x268 > > acpi_ex_field_datum_io+0x128/0x1b8 > > acpi_ex_extract_from_field+0x14c/0x2ac > > acpi_ex_read_data_from_field+0x190/0x1b8 > > acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value+0x1ec/0x288 > > acpi_ex_resolve_to_value+0x250/0x274 > > acpi_ds_evaluate_name_path+0xac/0x124 > > acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0x90/0x410 > > acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x4ac/0x5d8 > > acpi_ps_parse_aml+0xe0/0x2c8 > > acpi_ps_execute_method+0x19c/0x1ac > > acpi_ns_evaluate+0x1f8/0x26c > > acpi_ns_init_one_device+0x104/0x140 > > acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x158/0x1d0 > > acpi_ns_initialize_devices+0x194/0x218 > > acpi_initialize_objects+0x48/0x50 > > acpi_init+0xe0/0x498 > > > > As mentioned by Lorenzo: > > "We are forcing memory semantics mappings to PROT_NORMAL_NC, which > > eMAG does not like at all and I'd need to understand why. It looks > > like the issue happen in SystemMemory Opregion handler." > > > > Hence just revert it before everything is clear. > > > > Can we try to find the root cause first? -rc1 is not even out yet, and > reverting it now means we can not resubmit it until the next merge > window. Yes, absolutely. We need to understand where the problem is, because it looks like we can't map SystemMemory Opregion with NORMAL_NC if the PA is not in the EFI map, that's a problem (ie how can we determine the right memory attributes for SystemMemory Operation regions then) but let's not speculate and find what the issue is first. Lorenzo