Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762407AbWLKDsD (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:48:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762409AbWLKDsB (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:48:01 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:54472 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762406AbWLKDsB (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:48:01 -0500 Subject: pci_assign_resource() inconsistency From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Linux Kernel list Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:47:55 +1100 Message-Id: <1165808875.7260.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2350 Lines: 60 Hi ! pci_assign_resource() was recently marked as much check the result code (which I find annoying since it alread contains a printk if it fails but anyway ... ). So we do have a call to in in arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_32.c and I went to fix the warning and ... wondered what should we do there ? So I looked at other users and found it a bit strange... So at first, an unassigned resource has the IORESOURCE_UNSET flag set (or is supposed to). pci_assign_resource() itself will clear that flag if it succeeds. However, pretty much nothing else checks that flag, so it's mostly useful. Now, we have drivers/pci/setup-bus.c doing: if (pci_assign_resource(list->dev, idx)) { res->start = 0; res->end = 0; res->flags = 0; } So it basically destroys the resource content utterly when pci_assign_resource() fails... There are questions raised here: - Shouldn't we instead fix things so that instead, we properly test for IORESOURCE_UNSET in pci_request_* & friends and just have pci_assign_resource() continue as it's doing now, that is not clear that flag if the assignment fails ? - setup-bus.c is a bit violent: As soon as it hits a p2p bridge, it will bluntly re-assign everybody, not trying to check wether a resource was already correctly assigned by the firmware or not. However, it never sets IORESOURCE_UNSET. Thus if we do the above, we should probably have it always set that bit before calling pci_assign_resource()... Now the question is, what should I do in pci_32.c ... right now, we unconditionally clear IORESOURCE_UNSET, which isn't very correct, then call pci_assign_resource(). Should I do like the setup-bus.c and just completely wipe the resource if pci_assign_resource() fail ? Or should I just stop clearing IORESOURCE_UNSET (and thus rely on pci_assign_resource() to clear it only if it succeeds, which seems to work) in which case I see no point in making that function much check since there is nothing useful to do when it fails and it does printk already. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/