Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Use absolute_pointer for strcmp on fixed
 memory location
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
        Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sparse Mailing-list <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20210912160149.2227137-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
 <20210912160149.2227137-5-linux@roeck-us.net>
 <CAHk-=wi1=8shingNuo1CtfJ7eDByDsmwsz750Nbxq=7q0Gs+zg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <155e002d-9546-4090-fc62-fab91412aec7@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sun, 12 Sep 2021 13:15:09 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wi1=8shingNuo1CtfJ7eDByDsmwsz750Nbxq=7q0Gs+zg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 9/12/21 12:13 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 9:02 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> -       if (strcmp(COMMAND_LINE, "INSTALL") == 0) {
>> +       if (strcmp(absolute_pointer(COMMAND_LINE), "INSTALL") == 0) {
> 
> Again, this feels very much like treating the symptoms, not actually
> fixing the real issue.
> 
> It's COMMAND_LINE itself that should have been fixed up, not that one use of it.
> 
> Because the only reason you didn't get a warning from later uses is
> that 'strcmp()' is doing compiler-specific magic. You're just delaying
> the inevitable warnings about the other uses of that thing.
> 

Makes sense. I'll change the patch accordingly.

Thanks,
Guenter