Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6d25:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gq37csp1551830pxb; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 23:37:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJPvV/2EszWIW5WpfasT48SCDztCEU20GFsfbTI7YFZmTlPaKzctNPwCgZMw2SDLsjFA5B X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fc7:: with SMTP id c7mr11154005ejk.333.1631515033556; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 23:37:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631515033; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XTJCJC09G5bTK7BwUa2fim0qJIDs/rSjw37lbl9pObSSW7F0q8vkSw1z30OAJiZD5X Vj4aSdr2QpP2/W3Cgj9KMiCPlaYiq58ANKi27z+86rhIFIX+837RfV3dwRIGg+mWC/3W +J3P68VKqbti1S4+lVIkutl1jr8UT+F6funIdI8vhEw9pRmYHgzKDOheUIdnc6PYCCTK AJzNkMbTvKLhz0HY7MYmKUq9cfQTUagdr3A7hjM3b0NAGGybHA/YAPxaU51LMw/5NrRF P4CuH8db9VMeddPM7jsKVKSZSJK24P/KTCkuVmSCsWYQwkvlMhecqJu4KhMU/XElDPXs 9QjQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=PhHmbd+vGEUJyrV5DLTBHy+hH4Q8g3MAN2ba0j9CKCQ=; b=HaM5/Xu3FqnH3+oqBVeOTYrIK77c0kf0rsV182XkWblUXFiIo/ov909MR4GoTF8RhU DxwcPn8jz8fLky3BrGvhFkk3Nz5wgOcVOC/hm7N+LTWpZmlUdWRAum8gMGv6CODoLnKv iACsRifflakS7W15AegaSPMuCVfbp5WvgKPDM3w+p6o9GuRtjkVAtOqYjAnKo2PSPXSJ +dZ+QbCUNFgQsfKwA8aCJLSyW/3gjpgSjUey3uwfb7iiRdwFMeIDl6ftB207QSA543Oe OTtfUbfuKyZR7VpM3kVo8/hjTLqRiX5k8wFB+1CaWRbImRph6GR+2BHI+d15EiH82Vzg rl2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=MANHO9U4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j25si6375142eje.334.2021.09.12.23.36.50; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 23:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=MANHO9U4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237330AbhIMGes (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 02:34:48 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:33314 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232146AbhIMGer (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 02:34:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1631514811; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PhHmbd+vGEUJyrV5DLTBHy+hH4Q8g3MAN2ba0j9CKCQ=; b=MANHO9U4oiKwN99RdF8lY6ILjjTR+NtrlY3VwrCCkYRwlOFHCEviuVhv7cD4L5jkuqPB0J eLPgRSdk8SnoxZc7C97X/gjuCF6crkIzsX2n1CebrKUDbQn/ei5SlN8Tzh9cOsS6uufF8p zO7vB1/Pra9JLCdvoQUo2PKTnEY2Lro= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-556-xAsg16jcNDOMj9ROA6qmog-1; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 02:33:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: xAsg16jcNDOMj9ROA6qmog-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id y10-20020a056402270a00b003c8adc4d40cso4388371edd.15 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 23:33:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=PhHmbd+vGEUJyrV5DLTBHy+hH4Q8g3MAN2ba0j9CKCQ=; b=3FHsG3+BPSSvL5OmqdLi7RktnaBbxxTTfzVbwuqj1SSk8midEH17LgzpJCSTv13UI0 EvgRQzsaAUz4iXfl7S5Bd+DKmxlIRt7HiEovepl2HjgBpwVmzKM9UA7y4hQ2QKCTbDAd DB03rhWgGsRTKS9L22NdXBI2W4fMkf4A75dV0BbuDoHkejsQkpjyTeoJMkwb9XYM1DdX eZAmZ7DPVxx5qD8DDDeOiSgZW3MDIHEPgD8ALfIHe8GlWhf33fupHxCmm1IT0tMAkPI2 LHSzWpdr13D/YkqxIxC0jGaGRaJpYKNKIPIcS/OJXwNLncMxP2L0mFvaUzbc5SamAGBT S24A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uZ10FQoF+QOCQwk/IhQ8uk2IqL8DKnlVAJGFFEK7pJLBYhHLR Nc3VpEtDqNCc0KrsFm06pGOlmbIlykGCBaKnqctBwjNyIBDC0Ml9y5F28Vr8fkBFitf7q7VfLdX 9qtoRnutVGuIl2tftTYRXcYZ7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:919:: with SMTP id i25mr10772247ejd.171.1631514809694; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 23:33:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:919:: with SMTP id i25mr10772233ejd.171.1631514809559; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 23:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2.55.27.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm2917942ejj.10.2021.09.12.23.33.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 12 Sep 2021 23:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 02:33:25 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Wang Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, f.hetzelt@tu-berlin.de, david.kaplan@amd.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] virtio-pci: harden INTX interrupts Message-ID: <20210913022824-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20210913055353.35219-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20210913055353.35219-8-jasowang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210913055353.35219-8-jasowang@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:53:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch tries to make sure the virtio interrupt handler for INTX > won't be called after a reset and before virtio_device_ready(). We > can't use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN since we're using shared interrupt > (IRQF_SHARED). So this patch tracks the INTX enabling status in a new > intx_soft_enabled variable and toggle it during in > vp_disable/enable_vectors(). The INTX interrupt handler will check > intx_soft_enabled before processing the actual interrupt. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang Not all that excited about all the memory barriers for something that should be an extremely rare event (for most kernels - literally once per boot). Can't we do better? > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c > index 0b9523e6dd39..835197151dc1 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c > @@ -30,8 +30,12 @@ void vp_disable_vectors(struct virtio_device *vdev) > struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev); > int i; > > - if (vp_dev->intx_enabled) > + if (vp_dev->intx_enabled) { > + vp_dev->intx_soft_enabled = false; > + /* ensure the vp_interrupt see this intx_soft_enabled value */ > + smp_wmb(); > synchronize_irq(vp_dev->pci_dev->irq); > + } > > for (i = 0; i < vp_dev->msix_vectors; ++i) > disable_irq(pci_irq_vector(vp_dev->pci_dev, i)); > @@ -43,8 +47,12 @@ void vp_enable_vectors(struct virtio_device *vdev) > struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev); > int i; > > - if (vp_dev->intx_enabled) > + if (vp_dev->intx_enabled) { > + vp_dev->intx_soft_enabled = true; > + /* ensure the vp_interrupt see this intx_soft_enabled value */ > + smp_wmb(); > return; > + } > > for (i = 0; i < vp_dev->msix_vectors; ++i) > enable_irq(pci_irq_vector(vp_dev->pci_dev, i)); > @@ -97,6 +105,12 @@ static irqreturn_t vp_interrupt(int irq, void *opaque) > struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = opaque; > u8 isr; > > + if (!vp_dev->intx_soft_enabled) > + return IRQ_NONE; > + > + /* read intx_soft_enabled before read others */ > + smp_rmb(); > + > /* reading the ISR has the effect of also clearing it so it's very > * important to save off the value. */ > isr = ioread8(vp_dev->isr); > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h > index a235ce9ff6a5..3c06e0f92ee4 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct virtio_pci_device { > /* MSI-X support */ > int msix_enabled; > int intx_enabled; > + bool intx_soft_enabled; > cpumask_var_t *msix_affinity_masks; > /* Name strings for interrupts. This size should be enough, > * and I'm too lazy to allocate each name separately. */ > -- > 2.25.1