Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210907123112.10232-1-justin.he@arm.com> <20210907123112.10232-3-justin.he@arm.com>
 <CAOQ_QsjOmHw+545J0T9i-nWV2bVGGEwHq5SPVvBOM-SHMXpP5g@mail.gmail.com> <AM6PR08MB4376DB4B908AC37DF24290CFF7D59@AM6PR08MB4376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR08MB4376DB4B908AC37DF24290CFF7D59@AM6PR08MB4376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 08:21:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOQ_QshF+N7Q=-cXAoMSW4Gcy7mr_oFVpye7fEBqPeR8+3mK0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: Add memcg accounting to KVM allocations
To:     Justin He <justin.he@arm.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <Alexandru.Elisei@arm.com>,
        Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Justin,

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 8:57 AM Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Oliver, thanks for the review, please my comments below:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 6:29 AM
> > To: Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>; James Morse <James.Morse@arm.com>;
> > Alexandru Elisei <Alexandru.Elisei@arm.com>; Suzuki Poulose
> > <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>; Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>; Lorenzo
> > Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>; Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>;
> > Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>; Nick Desaulniers
> > <ndesaulniers@google.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Liu Shixin
> > <liushixin2@huawei.com>; Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>; Will
> > Deacon <will@kernel.org>; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-
> > kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: Add memcg accounting to KVM
> > allocations
> >
> > Hi Jia,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:33 AM Jia He <justin.he@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Inspired by commit 254272ce6505 ("kvm: x86: Add memcg accounting to KVM
> > > allocations"), it would be better to make arm64 KVM consistent with
> > > common kvm codes.
> > >
> > > The memory allocations of VM scope should be charged into VM process
> > > cgroup, hence change GFP_KERNEL to GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT.
> > >
> > > There remain a few cases since these allocations are global, not in VM
> > > scope.
> >
> > I believe there are more memory allocations that could be switched to
> > GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT. For non-pKVM kernels, we probably should charge
> > all stage-2 paging structure allocations to the VM process. Your patch
> > appears to only change the allocation of the kvm_pgtable structure,
> > but not descendent paging structures.
> >
> Do you mean kvm_hyp_zalloc_page() here?
> Seems kvm_hyp_zalloc_page() is in both global and VM scopes.

Doh! kvm_hyp_zalloc_page() is only for the hyp's page tables, hence I
believe your patch is correct as it stands. As such:

Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>