Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6d25:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gq37csp1823887pxb; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:22:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/5OhEUdnVILoQz+ODhbULEAFEgc4bgNCmdL+T1HX8GKpRV8lviTzqZzredLMqSrOut8VZ X-Received: by 2002:a92:c888:: with SMTP id w8mr7994643ilo.188.1631539366062; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:22:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631539366; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jS/k9sw1Gdkq1l7ibtCWizFPSPD5L1vy4+2ePQva/5CdBu0SN+x1fAZi2vC2nvuODb tmirBjvcUGBd1q/yI+FAAicjKMfVjOX4zwMcrtZHQEnoNPkz6v3LEOe21OSnbMfSAEbr GbdoUt0eq1VMa0Ok/cI0ag6062RXyrQF8Qocipn7SAiLEZX1RoTQ12Kj9VrdZif634JK 4b6s9QZFBctmOkTlAneLEGN2YUQwxuXVCSTyCgLrLX7hiBsq4vh0FPKtLKwnZW2DMVSX VeBGdD+hN+fjAEm8LuEfH5q0c56HuPS7PyjNQmqUEAQ8GhnP0TZdrAcsL4FQh0ZUo1GH P8MQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=fYSf+CkFDhn+E7ilU5ryVjyHOv+XBGa3YnU9uqY8rkU=; b=Ll+BumaiWLYM83WbaL39f4l+Zvn95W6lrsOzUzzBNDxu+RitHeRV0Rw/Z7OgGgXOc1 JGfRYFtvN0YX14vOPpFillyWaE+Z8uLqAbOpVckUkZhQLoLruFeSk3pEaLi08oUqEqUp zV3Lq2iVuqdSitHMr3iCCxsR26ahLSyuW6MTwc1xQnvK66Xjqt2NOsiNj4Dr9lf/Gn51 ediCxTyUjggh/EnkralermxJhox9mfivp9/ItoagH7Vb5PdYAYLedh4Kq3iDCILpAfBl yKh4kfKqGB5XkusguueV2ER0CDJ7vHev+5rhtuMh8Of6yv1wOeFBj1tV6EdYcuXmSe02 Nriw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=R6VERJFL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j24si7244958jaa.10.2021.09.13.06.22.33; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=R6VERJFL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240819AbhIMNVk (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:21:40 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35054 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240365AbhIMNU2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:20:28 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 768956108B; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:18:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1631539129; bh=W2ISwMdnPyCwnJiP7cxVsBm/OiemhP1eI/40S9FsmAw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R6VERJFLHHJ5whxgUtKEXeIN8sgUmYge9zmvKVh9yyR5TEljvJVH+qa40bofYpGVy h7ucNH0pjTbId0o+LG6Vh5wAcoiq7T41iRPK07UfIqXbqqHYeZUkumCnhJkisHHEPM cK+cfQgU6tYdjclORKxo+kg/KaYo+3gSjsKfV2NQ= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, He Fengqing , Alexei Starovoitov , Song Liu , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 051/144] bpf: Fix potential memleak and UAF in the verifier. Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:13:52 +0200 Message-Id: <20210913131049.650854559@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 In-Reply-To: <20210913131047.974309396@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210913131047.974309396@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: He Fengqing [ Upstream commit 75f0fc7b48ad45a2e5736bcf8de26c8872fe8695 ] In bpf_patch_insn_data(), we first use the bpf_patch_insn_single() to insert new instructions, then use adjust_insn_aux_data() to adjust insn_aux_data. If the old env->prog have no enough room for new inserted instructions, we use bpf_prog_realloc to construct new_prog and free the old env->prog. There have two errors here. First, if adjust_insn_aux_data() return ENOMEM, we should free the new_prog. Second, if adjust_insn_aux_data() return ENOMEM, bpf_patch_insn_data() will return NULL, and env->prog has been freed in bpf_prog_realloc, but we will use it in bpf_check(). So in this patch, we make the adjust_insn_aux_data() never fails. In bpf_patch_insn_data(), we first pre-malloc memory for the new insn_aux_data, then call bpf_patch_insn_single() to insert new instructions, at last call adjust_insn_aux_data() to adjust insn_aux_data. Fixes: 8041902dae52 ("bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns") Signed-off-by: He Fengqing Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Song Liu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210714101815.164322-1-hefengqing@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 4deaf15b7618..80b219d27e37 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -8401,10 +8401,11 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * insni[off, off + cnt). Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data by copying * [0, off) and [off, end) to new locations, so the patched range stays zero */ -static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_prog *new_prog, u32 off, u32 cnt) +static void adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, + struct bpf_prog *new_prog, u32 off, u32 cnt) { - struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; struct bpf_insn *insn = new_prog->insnsi; bool old_seen = old_data[off].seen; u32 prog_len; @@ -8417,12 +8418,9 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, old_data[off].zext_dst = insn_has_def32(env, insn + off + cnt - 1); if (cnt == 1) - return 0; + return; prog_len = new_prog->len; - new_data = vzalloc(array_size(prog_len, - sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data))); - if (!new_data) - return -ENOMEM; + memcpy(new_data, old_data, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * off); memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1)); @@ -8433,7 +8431,6 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } env->insn_aux_data = new_data; vfree(old_data); - return 0; } static void adjust_subprog_starts(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, u32 len) @@ -8454,6 +8451,14 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len) { struct bpf_prog *new_prog; + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data = NULL; + + if (len > 1) { + new_data = vzalloc(array_size(env->prog->len + len - 1, + sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data))); + if (!new_data) + return NULL; + } new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, off, patch, len); if (IS_ERR(new_prog)) { @@ -8461,10 +8466,10 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of verbose(env, "insn %d cannot be patched due to 16-bit range\n", env->insn_aux_data[off].orig_idx); + vfree(new_data); return NULL; } - if (adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_prog, off, len)) - return NULL; + adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_data, new_prog, off, len); adjust_subprog_starts(env, off, len); return new_prog; } -- 2.30.2