Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6d25:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gq37csp1889810pxb; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 07:36:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxywcSqF1/mtXV0As1s2lNW+zYlE/dUWXTVvJBRRD5I3vy8sk478j5b503fRXQ1BldB0KcL X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2696:: with SMTP id w22mr13818367edd.319.1631543760525; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 07:36:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631543760; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Qwy5tjHynL6An/0kiGH0/WTE8r9Z+1Izrwur7gl7rA/Dr08G8fEAc76FyXtUXI05mr J5QnTFE8R0eNPfimD4xM+RNnknSfNR0jVHbBWX7iTS3R/FgvBgtb8ULAR18R7QHW2YnI AqP3fQX7E9dutIgtrrvnHj/USoxo5AhDLYt4QReGcakCIjxgPr9F0w2bfOTlNMuKaUWO ejB0JfzhqqSdGhuPhaXpqg36gcH2nU94MBf9vWlWKXsw+f6D2XuFBJXxbFdoExbvqReY KbR2VYIqu6WwQ/BdP/MMR/v1Fq4cRrf9Nq7quqvsqagL99UR8ormBWVjeHeVvf4AOcUB PzfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=YLdQyFDChkeJVgwaJW/bBldAXWvB6o2girzUbHc6P5A=; b=QQzcLkbrdMALDoJu2SNxCm135wo49IiFGmwLlFsTnSNX6SuxquDABz82AgSdWqJfbu OuX3hDSaAWB5SQryfM6OTZIDS0kbU93+k/CuWU12MyjdsiXfAASiW4x+V22p3HFQ8HG7 GDHCY95dqThCgg1LfoRnCwQ1G3M86eumDTLWldfAfpNO81ff/LcGyPFrnKFMO48Yzw6M gLE1Oyr0OWiOrPaSPDrQFEk8dnzsdPNWW621vv+BQXSUZnwG9UzBTwC2PfaAfE2AFuPK 9tmjDjFBUi27naMPAlhCKf7piJAx/aSTDBmZFeQvhFkZYP8/7B6kd1wvdzdTnlL1Psmh 4L4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=N3LrqVOh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 8si9112417ejx.341.2021.09.13.07.35.34; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 07:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=N3LrqVOh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243918AbhIMOcV (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:32:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46940 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345394AbhIMO00 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:26:26 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2B5261B50; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:48:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1631540936; bh=e0lPvMGHaVSycE7Ty0zRKBBsk3XlGWYX5GQbxofUNzE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=N3LrqVOhjq81sZLC4njr8jQs5u7BZnXZgXCdEmLrebs2TtcHoQznxvdo4A6p8mU+M q1ZJh3REX3v7byZ10pSeHlop2NV51asJxU7SQVFOcaueatoTvH4NQvDqrwyYlva/Xn SKIyHx4DBnZG09B/r1JqRxagCOrKJmSuD4rBIrOw= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, He Fengqing , Alexei Starovoitov , Song Liu , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.14 094/334] bpf: Fix potential memleak and UAF in the verifier. Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:12:28 +0200 Message-Id: <20210913131116.557853328@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 In-Reply-To: <20210913131113.390368911@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210913131113.390368911@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: He Fengqing [ Upstream commit 75f0fc7b48ad45a2e5736bcf8de26c8872fe8695 ] In bpf_patch_insn_data(), we first use the bpf_patch_insn_single() to insert new instructions, then use adjust_insn_aux_data() to adjust insn_aux_data. If the old env->prog have no enough room for new inserted instructions, we use bpf_prog_realloc to construct new_prog and free the old env->prog. There have two errors here. First, if adjust_insn_aux_data() return ENOMEM, we should free the new_prog. Second, if adjust_insn_aux_data() return ENOMEM, bpf_patch_insn_data() will return NULL, and env->prog has been freed in bpf_prog_realloc, but we will use it in bpf_check(). So in this patch, we make the adjust_insn_aux_data() never fails. In bpf_patch_insn_data(), we first pre-malloc memory for the new insn_aux_data, then call bpf_patch_insn_single() to insert new instructions, at last call adjust_insn_aux_data() to adjust insn_aux_data. Fixes: 8041902dae52 ("bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns") Signed-off-by: He Fengqing Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Song Liu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210714101815.164322-1-hefengqing@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 49f07e2bf23b..10084c0600dd 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -11414,10 +11414,11 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * insni[off, off + cnt). Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data by copying * [0, off) and [off, end) to new locations, so the patched range stays zero */ -static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_prog *new_prog, u32 off, u32 cnt) +static void adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, + struct bpf_prog *new_prog, u32 off, u32 cnt) { - struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; struct bpf_insn *insn = new_prog->insnsi; u32 old_seen = old_data[off].seen; u32 prog_len; @@ -11430,12 +11431,9 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, old_data[off].zext_dst = insn_has_def32(env, insn + off + cnt - 1); if (cnt == 1) - return 0; + return; prog_len = new_prog->len; - new_data = vzalloc(array_size(prog_len, - sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data))); - if (!new_data) - return -ENOMEM; + memcpy(new_data, old_data, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * off); memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1)); @@ -11446,7 +11444,6 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } env->insn_aux_data = new_data; vfree(old_data); - return 0; } static void adjust_subprog_starts(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, u32 len) @@ -11481,6 +11478,14 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len) { struct bpf_prog *new_prog; + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data = NULL; + + if (len > 1) { + new_data = vzalloc(array_size(env->prog->len + len - 1, + sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data))); + if (!new_data) + return NULL; + } new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, off, patch, len); if (IS_ERR(new_prog)) { @@ -11488,10 +11493,10 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of verbose(env, "insn %d cannot be patched due to 16-bit range\n", env->insn_aux_data[off].orig_idx); + vfree(new_data); return NULL; } - if (adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_prog, off, len)) - return NULL; + adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_data, new_prog, off, len); adjust_subprog_starts(env, off, len); adjust_poke_descs(new_prog, off, len); return new_prog; -- 2.30.2