Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6d25:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gq37csp1907614pxb; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5BCDQSV97SsbKRdj/QL1ij8Rbu6q2W31nQKR4ajf6GS+sTx3oZz2IIkwywlQ2ACAIqr8N X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:311b:: with SMTP id 27mr13414527ejx.428.1631545069487; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631545069; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fjGML/OUxIOp641QNDSk7aIJIzQzKIBbcaQqcIXBtqIiTdxTExiAEaNX7rYcrHNAF0 cJSogORJiVxLF595yPhfssvsN5+CZLyvriFVWIAjIHkQb2zx67vEuFMsrjiRksK9p4fo IrWavSFS6TsfejfSTaA3ajsBP9igcn7oIDFjkWN/4HCPfcgbKrWim2y4y0w4EXGMaSTk EPnLtclDkjdGwtup/YAxFhLdt21AobtwYTbn2ku0lun7rq0O0XPwUeI8wnTQmm7M1N93 B3gfnKBr7ug0Jt+VrVqXVIuN2NJ/UBomyzVg4LrNiQ8STR2hA3OzCQV7wkQIlZl7S9Ow 43Qw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=q5ZDLIR6LDYM34792nucQbrpj/h3iGfKGDaQSWPiWgg=; b=bp/3g5a3PJ6lP51fr7d+Z6GBI6djcMJUjXkm1sOSkOHU8ioTVFqMB9r7+eLQfw772/ u2i791tHAv3kK0MZiKDPur48kzceP2VzMUQAihUEEPaox6kI7I4nbJyOL7x8vYiVt+vd Thks29pZYc5cexQqFaYgk9NNviGQLy6OkqJp5zzS6j8xvE+slJsuoNHnbO8Kw0SO1TRA kQQckzcSlBep24RfbusD9/IxZ1t2yZFxm/3/xrj3iMftJC7E/+7kinqJK/dwpj6UGFrB fWWElss3QpdgWllb5Q+vzXLnUawg2juPbIwKOXRDK3ByyZBFDJW/5vvPMg8uUpzPpnJO Ue0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s18si9410290ejh.472.2021.09.13.07.57.23; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346895AbhIMOxW (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:53:22 -0400 Received: from 212.199.177.27.static.012.net.il ([212.199.177.27]:43003 "EHLO herzl.nuvoton.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347065AbhIMOsk (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:48:40 -0400 Received: from taln60.nuvoton.co.il (ntil-fw [212.199.177.25]) by herzl.nuvoton.co.il (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 18DEiVpf003100; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:44:31 +0300 Received: by taln60.nuvoton.co.il (Postfix, from userid 10140) id 8A0B663A1D; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:44:41 +0300 (IDT) From: amirmizi6@gmail.com To: Eyal.Cohen@nuvoton.com, jarkko@kernel.org, oshrialkoby85@gmail.com, alexander.steffen@infineon.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, benoit.houyere@st.com, eajames@linux.ibm.com, joel@jms.id.au Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, oshri.alkoby@nuvoton.com, tmaimon77@gmail.com, gcwilson@us.ibm.com, kgoldman@us.ibm.com, Dan.Morav@nuvoton.com, oren.tanami@nuvoton.com, shmulik.hager@nuvoton.com, amir.mizinski@nuvoton.com, Amir Mizinski Subject: [PATCH v14 2/7] tpm: tpm_tis: Fix expected bit handling and send all bytes in one shot without last byte in exception Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:43:46 +0300 Message-Id: <20210913144351.101167-3-amirmizi6@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20210913144351.101167-1-amirmizi6@gmail.com> References: <20210913144351.101167-1-amirmizi6@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Amir Mizinski Detected an incorrect implementation of the send command. Currently, the driver polls the TPM_STS.stsValid field until TRUE; then it reads TPM_STS register again to verify only that TPM_STS.expect field is FALSE (i.e., it ignores TPM_STS.stsValid). Since TPM_STS.stsValid represents the TPM_STS.expect validity, both fields fields should be checked in the same TPM_STS register read value. This fix modifies the signature of 'wait_for_tpm_stat()', adding an additional "mask_result" parameter to its call and renaming it to 'tpm_tis_wait_for_stat()' for better alignment with other naming. 'tpm_tis_wait_for_stat()' is now polling the TPM_STS with a mask and waits for the value in mask_result. The fix adds the ability to check if certain TPM_STS bits have been cleared. This change is also aligned to verifying the CRC on I2C TPM. The CRC verification should be done after the TPM_STS.expect field is cleared (TPM received all expected command bytes and set the calculated CRC value in the register). In addition, the send command was changed to comply with TCG_DesignPrinciples_TPM2p0Driver_vp24_pubrev.pdf as follows: - send all command bytes in one loop - remove special handling of the last byte Suggested-by: Benoit Houyere Signed-off-by: Amir Mizinski --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 70 +++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c index 69579ef..b34e59b 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c @@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, return false; } -static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, - unsigned long timeout, wait_queue_head_t *queue, - bool check_cancel) +static int tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, u8 stat, + unsigned long timeout, + wait_queue_head_t *queue, bool check_cancel) { unsigned long stop; long rc; @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, /* check current status */ status = chip->ops->status(chip); - if ((status & mask) == mask) + if ((status & mask) == stat) return 0; stop = jiffies + timeout; @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, usleep_range(TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MIN, TPM_TIMEOUT_USECS_MAX); status = chip->ops->status(chip); - if ((status & mask) == mask) + if ((status & mask) == stat) return 0; } while (time_before(jiffies, stop)); } @@ -259,10 +259,11 @@ static int recv_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) int size = 0, burstcnt, rc; while (size < count) { - rc = wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, - TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, - chip->timeout_c, - &priv->read_queue, true); + rc = tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip, + TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, + TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, + chip->timeout_c, &priv->read_queue, + true); if (rc < 0) return rc; burstcnt = get_burstcount(chip); @@ -315,8 +316,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) goto out; } - if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_c, - &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { + if (tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, TPM_STS_VALID, + chip->timeout_c, &priv->int_queue, + false) < 0) { size = -ETIME; goto out; } @@ -342,61 +344,40 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len) struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); int rc, status, burstcnt; size_t count = 0; - bool itpm = priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND; status = tpm_tis_status(chip); if ((status & TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY) == 0) { tpm_tis_ready(chip); - if (wait_for_tpm_stat - (chip, TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY, chip->timeout_b, - &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { + if (tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip, TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY, + TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY, + chip->timeout_b, &priv->int_queue, + false) < 0) { rc = -ETIME; goto out_err; } } - while (count < len - 1) { + while (count < len) { burstcnt = get_burstcount(chip); if (burstcnt < 0) { dev_err(&chip->dev, "Unable to read burstcount\n"); rc = burstcnt; goto out_err; } - burstcnt = min_t(int, burstcnt, len - count - 1); + burstcnt = min_t(int, burstcnt, len - count); rc = tpm_tis_write_bytes(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality), burstcnt, buf + count); if (rc < 0) goto out_err; count += burstcnt; - - if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_c, - &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { - rc = -ETIME; - goto out_err; - } - status = tpm_tis_status(chip); - if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) { - rc = -EIO; - goto out_err; - } } - - /* write last byte */ - rc = tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality), buf[count]); - if (rc < 0) - goto out_err; - - if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_c, - &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { + if (tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID | TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT, + TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_a, + &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { rc = -ETIME; goto out_err; } - status = tpm_tis_status(chip); - if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) != 0) { - rc = -EIO; - goto out_err; - } return 0; @@ -451,9 +432,10 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len) ordinal = be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 6))); dur = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal); - if (wait_for_tpm_stat - (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, dur, - &priv->read_queue, false) < 0) { + if (tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip, + TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, + TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, + dur, &priv->read_queue, false) < 0) { rc = -ETIME; goto out_err; } -- 2.7.4