Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 119/144] bcma: Fix memory leak for internally-handled cores
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:15:00 +0200
Message-Id: <20210913131051.906335372@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210913131047.974309396@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20210913131047.974309396@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit b63aed3ff195130fef12e0af590f4838cf0201d8 ]

kmemleak reported that dev_name() of internally-handled cores were leaked
on driver unbinding. Let's use device_initialize() to take refcounts for
them and put_device() to properly free the related stuff.

While looking at it, there's another potential issue for those which should
be *registered* into driver core. If device_register() failed, we put
device once and freed bcma_device structures. In bcma_unregister_cores(),
they're treated as unregistered and we hit both UAF and double-free. That
smells not good and has also been fixed now.

Fixes: ab54bc8460b5 ("bcma: fill core details for every device")
Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210727025232.663-2-yuzenghui@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/bcma/main.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bcma/main.c b/drivers/bcma/main.c
index 6535614a7dc1..1df2b5801c3b 100644
--- a/drivers/bcma/main.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/main.c
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bcma_core_irq);
 
 void bcma_prepare_core(struct bcma_bus *bus, struct bcma_device *core)
 {
+	device_initialize(&core->dev);
 	core->dev.release = bcma_release_core_dev;
 	core->dev.bus = &bcma_bus_type;
 	dev_set_name(&core->dev, "bcma%d:%d", bus->num, core->core_index);
@@ -277,11 +278,10 @@ static void bcma_register_core(struct bcma_bus *bus, struct bcma_device *core)
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = device_register(&core->dev);
+	err = device_add(&core->dev);
 	if (err) {
 		bcma_err(bus, "Could not register dev for core 0x%03X\n",
 			 core->id.id);
-		put_device(&core->dev);
 		return;
 	}
 	core->dev_registered = true;
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ void bcma_unregister_cores(struct bcma_bus *bus)
 	/* Now noone uses internally-handled cores, we can free them */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(core, tmp, &bus->cores, list) {
 		list_del(&core->list);
-		kfree(core);
+		put_device(&core->dev);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2