Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937386AbWLKR6i (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:58:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S937391AbWLKR6i (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:58:38 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:40137 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937386AbWLKR6h (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:58:37 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least) From: Arjan van de Ven To: Olaf Hering Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andy Whitcroft , Herbert Poetzl , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve Fox In-Reply-To: <20061211175026.GA18628@aepfle.de> References: <457D750C.9060807@shadowen.org> <20061211163333.GA17947@aepfle.de> <20061211175026.GA18628@aepfle.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:57:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1165859874.27217.382.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1394 Lines: 30 On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 18:50 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > What crud. I'm even slightly inclined to just let SLES9 be broken, just to > > let people know how unacceptable it is to look for strings in kernel > > binaries. But sadly, I don't think the poor users should be penalized for > > some idiotic SLES developers bad taste. > > SLES7 or SLES11 is not any different than SLES9 in that respect. > Suppose I send you some random vmlinux binary. How do you (you as in linus.sh) > know what 'uname -r' is inside this binary? > There are surely many many ways to pass that info. Having a string like > 'Linux version 2.6.19-g9202f325-dirty' somewhere in the binary is the > most reliable one. Dont you agree? it's for sure the most ugly one. I could see the use of having modinfo work on the vmlinux, and have the vmlinux have a VERMAGIC as well. It's only a simple elf section after all, and a heck of a lot more defined and standard... -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/