Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp220123pxb; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtBWdHFkwyRFzb+TCTJULFY6c6odzalZ7GKLKBBK5SpVyqaUy7m0jKCECAwZZ+xAfNgkPd X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:36d6:: with SMTP id b22mr15380655ejc.387.1631579391990; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:29:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631579391; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sBBiIaVwcICeui/IHf6vS4rQ4U/DqpzqUbl6drrHj1E5DMFrrovDVij6txKvudaENb j4w+62W6QZZWrwUcoEb8sHgTEZn6qdcSkPq+edNo76E+ff47N8QDEdQNRVLFKotE61Na u5nZ2iuEqWalQA1QZdtSSOZrj30KgHrbFHBjfpJvogzNLtWQbTXPzgdgbkuS4pfvUOz8 GKY1crfTb6fuem8B/fCpuaSpkSZQ1bcw1qXV+xWTflICn2EWIoaRTcLtF1WaPqTGB4df eag8YrUMgFS5aKPh6IaMKAnZ9kBjx0Iqg8ASHb4hQ/oNKOg8lhkW1ffYyD87thQ3jhdk v8cw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=tTqNy2HPFGkZBcc9wlcrrW4TuW+dnX6DMug9Ee7bsNU=; b=Hp6rgGia6CXpdMzVdu9z65sUQA6qL0chUn+3Oa9ZCWY9kPZMFt227KrsU/9YOOx0Kz YlteZqrC8TWDdyOUUsVRLgz2/0aIWAQdQfwmJ2qTS7QU3KWR4H7tdrOuS3rzoApYk0Yj B2yKPpLnqe7IHZ90mtY8Vnu7gwy+Nmc67pD9ztrCFO+M6Nw55hwjWYWen9nFWhPBQlPk Gr5yIu7UZ56LHT4jtXFWX6uGw0eTCfjWPszBV5m2vAeaJIW5e3k6Dikir8Mjw55l2CMv 1pDyzFX1MyGdhImtjm0qxezlu3ARiXc3yJl9+ihQRsCklBbKQ68yTIf7wDI/Lam7LLU4 iZMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=dcj2DZQj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dz8si8966461edb.30.2021.09.13.17.29.28; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:29:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=dcj2DZQj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240502AbhIMOQS (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:16:18 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34432 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344243AbhIMOLR (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:11:17 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91A3661AA8; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:42:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1631540533; bh=EB1r5Yr637ISSg4xwlnZbCG//Nyb9WBYl3rh+8XpsB4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dcj2DZQjOjKjK7Zaegy8CFmtTvmxTLhQt2+FDuDkscV/E3nyPn2SZAaSv6TxDa/a/ dC1/YqqFf3QVussT+ST8zWuo0ZGu01vwXuarZH8+dnx2lBgExdaXNRNCth0xJLKIlg uUVLReGoadKlXwG69VHMIrYb5fEvwQSWgDPMP2xc= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, "J. Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.13 200/300] nfsd4: Fix forced-expiry locking Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:14:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20210913131116.124627036@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 In-Reply-To: <20210913131109.253835823@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210913131109.253835823@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: J. Bruce Fields [ Upstream commit f7104cc1a9159cd0d3e8526cb638ae0301de4b61 ] This should use the network-namespace-wide client_lock, not the per-client cl_lock. You shouldn't see any bugs unless you're actually using the forced-expiry interface introduced by 89c905beccbb. Fixes: 89c905beccbb "nfsd: allow forced expiration of NFSv4 clients" Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 90e81f6491ff..ab81e8ae3265 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -2665,9 +2665,9 @@ static void force_expire_client(struct nfs4_client *clp) struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(clp->net, nfsd_net_id); bool already_expired; - spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock); + spin_lock(&nn->client_lock); clp->cl_time = 0; - spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock); + spin_unlock(&nn->client_lock); wait_event(expiry_wq, atomic_read(&clp->cl_rpc_users) == 0); spin_lock(&nn->client_lock); -- 2.30.2