Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 08:02:24 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
        Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@codeaurora.org>,
        Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
        kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>,
        Taras Madan <tarasmadan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] workqueue, kasan: avoid alloc_pages() when
 recording stack
Message-ID: <YT+SMKI1SW3FOACn@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <20210913112609.2651084-1-elver@google.com>
 <20210913112609.2651084-7-elver@google.com>
 <YT+EStsWldSp76HX@slm.duckdns.org>
 <CANpmjNPA9qW8i=gHvrdMRag0kOrOJR-zCZe6tpucOB4XN8dfWQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNPA9qW8i=gHvrdMRag0kOrOJR-zCZe6tpucOB4XN8dfWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 07:58:39PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > Please feel free to route with the rest of series or if you want me to take
> > these through the wq tree, please let me know.
> 
> Usually KASAN & stackdepot patches go via the -mm tree. I hope the
> 1-line change to workqueue won't conflict with other changes pending
> in the wq tree. Unless you or Andrew tells us otherwise, I assume
> these will at some point appear in -mm.

That part is really unlikely to cause conflicts and -mm sits on top of all
other trees anyway, so it should be completely fine.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun