Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:51:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:51:23 -0500 Received: from 24-163-106-43.he2.cox.rr.com ([24.163.106.43]:48558 "EHLO asd.ppp0.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:51:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:50:23 -0500 Subject: Re: /proc/stat description for proc.txt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v475) Cc: Sven Heinicke , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Dilger From: Anthony DeRobertis In-Reply-To: <20011115115939.I5739@lynx.no> Message-Id: <06F0B144-DAB2-11D5-B38E-00039355CFA6@suespammers.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.475) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Nov 15, 2001 10:29 -0500, Sven Heinicke wrote: > +cpu 58903 1 7337 221340 > + > +The individual "cpu" entry is will be the same as "cpu0" if you only > +have one CPU on your system. Otherwise the "cpu" entry will be a > +total of all the separate CPU stats. Isn't the first sentence redundant? Also, the second one is a little confusing because "Otherwise..." implies a difference, when there is none. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/