Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763090AbWLKUlJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:41:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S937501AbWLKUlJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:41:09 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:34831 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763090AbWLKUlG (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:41:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:40:52 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Dmitriy Monakhov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management , , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] incorrect error handling inside generic_file_direct_write Message-Id: <20061211124052.144e69a0.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <87k60y1rq4.fsf@sw.ru> References: <87k60y1rq4.fsf@sw.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2531 Lines: 65 On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:34:27 +0300 Dmitriy Monakhov wrote: > OpenVZ team has discovered error inside generic_file_direct_write() > If generic_file_direct_IO() has fail (ENOSPC condition) it may have instantiated > a few blocks outside i_size. And fsck will complain about wrong i_size > (ext2, ext3 and reiserfs interpret i_size and biggest block difference as error), > after fsck will fix error i_size will be increased to the biggest block, > but this blocks contain gurbage from previous write attempt, this is not > information leak, but its silence file data corruption. > We need truncate any block beyond i_size after write have failed , do in simular > generic_file_buffered_write() error path. > > Exampe: > open("mnt2/FILE3", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_DIRECT, 0666) = 3 > write(3, "aaaaaa"..., 4096) = -1 ENOSPC (No space left on device) > > stat mnt2/FILE3 > File: `mnt2/FILE3' > Size: 0 Blocks: 4 IO Block: 4096 regular empty file > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>^^^^^^^^^^ file size is less than biggest block idx > Device: 700h/1792d Inode: 14 Links: 1 > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) > > fsck.ext2 -f -n mnt1/fs_img > Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes > Inode 14, i_size is 0, should be 2048. Fix? no > > Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Monakhov > ---------- > > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c > index 7b84dc8..bf7cf6c 100644 > --- a/mm/filemap.c > +++ b/mm/filemap.c > @@ -2041,6 +2041,14 @@ generic_file_direct_write(struct kiocb * > mark_inode_dirty(inode); > } > *ppos = end; > + } else if (written < 0) { > + loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode); > + /* > + * generic_file_direct_IO() may have instantiated a few blocks > + * outside i_size. Trim these off again. > + */ > + if (pos + count > isize) > + vmtruncate(inode, isize); > } > XFS (at least) can call generic_file_direct_write() with i_mutex not held. And vmtruncate() expects i_mutex to be held. I guess a suitable solution would be to push this problem back up to the callers: let them decide whether to run vmtruncate() and if so, to ensure that i_mutex is held. The existence of generic_file_aio_write_nolock() makes that rather messy though. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/