Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp298651pxb; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7zSHu9NCFopi+p+Aeha8KEzcNTQJ1MQDTMfgf5ZZxABTqt9iX4l6Rmfw3Dvb141WQBLoy X-Received: by 2002:a50:eacc:: with SMTP id u12mr16703645edp.140.1631587941305; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631587941; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sBNdN8n6igxfljK8ESIKqWStDPkoonvRbSySc7LFHYE94jYSCTKJ9VMUAJ8lXFgfYn 6TLGK4IPwjhklOZ481QvhBBWznFjV0oDI/h//ahzJpMzuVHXgLK9RfeXySB01hiDcyDe ERJP2d4vV1Y7u9Y2z/78u4lImZaGOxH3O1LXQYL28KgYraz3f6S7V9z+bPaaDshM812d X9QA5dKJFkQIZ1CMtkCa+NfAuYHncD8slLC4Y7kVPz0fbK8zUKgeiIPHmiks88F+B7ME HFYb1ZR9Zt4PHFc9oxzdBDEI+qvpofQTqItTPLAeqf+PgoNGRXT7zIMYxla7PE6T2FOI BWWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=JsnAeYbXsFjdk+RoHL+tTHQAs2HG9I8IykG2c562hmI=; b=AGyTzbFbKz2mk4k0OH2Cyx16EqW42y9Tra9At6xh9kQgK4cMnoZuekM+fvXuRPseVo kwn/kkX7JoO2w3xUYdAS008ndi89s/wgkVH1rPdKIINc6ik5iXBUYIV9Rf8Pe7ej6HUP ihmuhR411g/pt9GABDrcEvsSIQO/ITxYsxRWrImVp8Z2OGd0uKypZ/ZScLGNz2fQvNNX SFEWfqQxTrbxIFW8GysorcTgw34yOT3EFE0i1HQ9Lau8siHF908oUV4EBW8cTGmsa8c1 J946eFNRXRIZgZ/RBGag5loPNNznU2JPROQ82ls7fVL7gXXhCTyJ/CUluNisV+kwZPuY viPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.s=201909 header.b=jW7eREwP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ka17si9031152ejc.609.2021.09.13.19.51.57; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.s=201909 header.b=jW7eREwP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237777AbhINCvr (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:51:47 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:59569 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234374AbhINCvr (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:51:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1631587829; bh=JsnAeYbXsFjdk+RoHL+tTHQAs2HG9I8IykG2c562hmI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=jW7eREwP9w272/dsi7k+mRzIGBo7m0BXY67Kv5V3K6eXbic3CLP9qs+l1ltY1OUp9 bbI5tMIsK+S4woQZvjhXJOpjNadrQFIK+RXw4qevqDPGttfg2k8732jwTiWFB6MzOm Q6meSn295Ahto+peB8Oa3jcky1D1B+H87Mr+6JwcPIhcEFX13j/a6LBFmRU/wYxbiK b7+dAOsdvxPrvtfeAK72alqIuoXsInfu6XKRJ9A9P9UelSwudEfFkkfYRb9HN2iMuu ztfDpBnVHPKxxzZlGm9JGBomZnYUyBZCaAv7f9vti3lpzb2o8v5RQhHvwYIz0jiG/S r4kVMPtuRS0wQ== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4H7ns12Qmvz9sR4; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:50:29 +1000 (AEST) From: Michael Ellerman To: Linus Torvalds , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , PowerPC Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree In-Reply-To: References: <20210914100853.3f502bc9@canb.auug.org.au> <20210914105359.5c651d55@canb.auug.org.au> <20210914120818.4a102b46@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:50:25 +1000 Message-ID: <87mtoflvke.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:08 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> That patch works for me - for the ppc64_defconfig build at least. > > Yeah, I just tested the allmodconfig case too, although I suspect it's > essentially the same wrt the boot *.S files, so it probably doesn't > matter. > > I'd like to have Michael or somebody who can actually run some tests > on the end result ack that patch (or - even better - come up with > something cleaner) before committing it. > > Because yeah, the build failure is annoying and I apologize, but I'd > rather have the build fail overnight than commit something that builds > but then is subtle buggy for some reason. > > But if I don't get any other comments by the time I'm up again > tomorrow, I'll just commit it as "fixes the build". I'll have a look and get back to you before tomorrow. cheers