Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp390356pxb; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:59:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDY89RvDHfGxFiZ5+1OOsioKX89DcmTkdYNOx7GGFsffVVZskdnqL4aC2pXpg7BGeYCW9j X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:229c:: with SMTP id cw28mr14067937edb.356.1631599146307; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:59:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631599146; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Mxs8Llna4qBm5+FElNbN1Yk5glgMkVwiS0SGutKMQOTPwUNBdOMIFUpq/oDa6F+qbq g0hmlTWo0Dbtnstp1yn9hj3Cy4NzkjYAba2NKKXpRQsnBlx+TKljpUwwuAxsGxBNW7/Z f/TqS/hdDxGYT1RxR1JFA1e2g3rqUSrg++tOaZcG4+bpEg21pYZAUZatSItzERtD9VSP enlR0zV2itRpN6RP8C+Cf/4KBgWYO+lwd5DayF0X19c0WYL4ouyHiCJFKiUy4fI4vUt0 SgnDkESI6+ArGi58LEOyUKq6hYxNpVqvkunbAW1+lkiYAknKjSFFpFMhfpCKjwcVJ5Ve OTbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=73bi6it4gjJbrBuLDIJpdXx+yqm4ktFJ0GsBXEX9Zvc=; b=HlYIMRmrRQdIBR7JspA4hl79SvvF9LQUuYuANfC8yhMIAqWGFuxHjTMKwdA4FP7ay8 JZkkfGk0/hQCSn1kDClITr6BRMGpPjzTE3EksXlFW9NsIJTMQz1gRzC9XPmWTgDnylnR LeovDW+68pa18XQVVn5OPgSoUDnOaFVoTEnMeZE6tnZaj4RsRtDaDEuK4zs2MYWc3a2X 1SjJmJEbA3KKHIrI66I8uTGJRI/PVXmsncAqVVVfJN9fBh7xJq3+FLOMc0MeY8DbqaNt f2snQ1NjBygcVsQTJGem4eEpW+ETjdLvS1DWgmvIVnUHlgHDQy2JM+z7MY7FQL74z5/3 fcRQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GEj2xA3+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b15si12471831edm.218.2021.09.13.22.58.43; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GEj2xA3+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240024AbhINF5w (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 01:57:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59712 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239844AbhINF5k (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 01:57:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A177C0617AF; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id g16so18241672wrb.3; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:56:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=73bi6it4gjJbrBuLDIJpdXx+yqm4ktFJ0GsBXEX9Zvc=; b=GEj2xA3+IC3xJS5HPubduuXygw3RWFJTkVXFCVJw+n3XPauG6l1Jn9C6LASqjefgp9 UqEs5LIAOmfknADFilJ21dqXDxJivbpqjJncphkGrwWNgn67m74hVBNEQ+x9JBHYe1zx W+GmLzg1YXKJDXMiK3goBYU+NI5UFRXrXJ1W8SBmx5L23yFUH1CJgSnHNECSO5CIfaGn 5ziweN1cXuuw5Qk/2FJcAWB3XSgF70Gdx2gCd8v/ocaj4PRobHw2BlJgT5M9kRBsKECh qUNT9CnbHpXyqnLKQHLcCH9Ga+k5lpGtzqdz0QkhxY3ciRyz8+vtQlBx0/GJ5N+Ho6Sc KDOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=73bi6it4gjJbrBuLDIJpdXx+yqm4ktFJ0GsBXEX9Zvc=; b=3/jnPzcqC9zIiBKJYffArtrruWPmSFd5gXRPz6X1wbzfqPTxxL1sfBBTI5DyeQDSj+ 5w6xcRbrBbWGz/cs8CfxmeGJGBhoUIggdDbZyMo04dsdzF9K1W3HobaWkPxtO/d5zUC1 UUkIDihA1hRbth9IdAhS19iCmnlEq1G9jyas2z/mZRU8v87kZKIZGBoxFoq18yQCU3pA 0wD8uj+OmBN6ZJzG85pIjkU0NLEkgqbqB6LkG803JwNE7dK2nukfX+VSgglyGxeCP1ar 5hCzBZsT/vUEAfSpgDkszKRH7r1qzCf+QKQn96XpBgWjit6GMKv0DDROyOqyyU/LkPDg /2AA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531E9aZpl1gN5ZiMEXAEGwwoH8dA5W+aCgn++S92Ki3vRA4CkyD3 CEj9BovaqyfC34EVN2FomBw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1284:: with SMTP id f4mr16839464wrx.88.1631598965742; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ea:8f08:4500:d493:df4c:6694:d298? (p200300ea8f084500d493df4c6694d298.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ea:8f08:4500:d493:df4c:6694:d298]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h16sm9376626wre.52.2021.09.13.22.56.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] Linux 5.15-rc1 - 82599ES VPD access isue To: Dave Jones Cc: Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , intel-wired-lan , Bjorn Helgaas , todd.fujinaka@intel.com, Hisashi T Fujinaka References: <20210913141818.GA27911@codemonkey.org.uk> <20210913201519.GA15726@codemonkey.org.uk> <20210913203234.GA6762@codemonkey.org.uk> From: Heiner Kallweit Message-ID: <367cc748-d411-8cf8-ff95-07715c55e899@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:51:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14.09.2021 01:32, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2021, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >> On 13.09.2021 22:32, Dave Jones wrote: >> >> + Jesse and Tony as Intel NIC maintainers >> >>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:22:57PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>> >>> >> This didn't help I'm afraid :( >>> >> It changed the VPD warning, but that's about it... >>> >> >>> >> [  184.235496] pci 0000:02:00.0: calling  quirk_blacklist_vpd+0x0/0x22 @ 1 >>> >> [  184.235499] pci 0000:02:00.0: [Firmware Bug]: disabling VPD access (can't determine size of non-standard VPD format) >>> >> [  184.235501] pci 0000:02:00.0: quirk_blacklist_vpd+0x0/0x22 took 0 usecs >>> >> >>> > With this patch there's no VPD access to this device any longer. So this can't be >>> > the root cause. Do you have any other PCI device that has VPD capability? >>> > -> Capabilities: [...] Vital Product Data >>> >>> >>> 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01) >>>         Subsystem: Device 1dcf:030a >>>     ... >>>             Capabilities: [e0] Vital Product Data >>>                 Unknown small resource type 06, will not decode more. >>> >> >> When searching I found the same symptom of invalid VPD data for 82599EB. >> Do these adapters have non-VPD data in VPD address space? Or is the actual >> VPD data at another offset than 0? I know that few Chelsio devices have >> such a non-standard VPD structure. >> >>> >>> I'll add that to the quirk list and see if that helps. >>> >>>     Dave >>> >> Heiner > > Sorry to reply from my personal account. If I did it from my work > account I'd be top-posting because of Outlook and that goes over like a > lead balloon. > > Anyway, can you send us a dump of your eeprom using ethtool -e? You can > either send it via a bug on e1000.sourceforge.net or try sending it to > todd.fujinaka@intel.com > > The other thing is I'm wondering is what the subvendor device ID you > have is referring to because it's not in the pci database. Some ODMs > like getting creative with what they put in the NVM. > > Todd Fujinaka (todd.fujinaka@intel.com) Thanks for the prompt reply. Dave, could you please provide the requested information?