Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp400439pxb; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:16:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxp/krVTVYk9a+rXJzQnVB6prKHd0ZKHoOf60uV20u+5ELCFnYE2BAW2zDZiWA3pvYKKs9 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1cb9:: with SMTP id cz25mr15113778edb.364.1631600167007; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:16:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631600167; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NIo2CkClAd6wSr4FKKO9IVwJgbXTJFBZoQB73vEMYrsVCHttj2ru0wFIeEtzutJAGn 5hP5NGk9Wb2GQrxWz0f/7IBjoX0nd4R7qFVBttRHP51SO/tbLv6t9irEI8cDhfEhKHCu 41QKa/jLxgJSII8yUD+ylEkSJb+J4pHh0u4q+d+V1aRwPp4CxLUvp1DmQ5y9YyiF20Ck ZT3TY6UUZPl/gUTMljed7HLRD98CEeewusE6Kr6wvBouP+cZRio3gzATh7sW0VS0s+8P rLLYa1r4MqewLwkQS+0vVUZBlP/cFTFT1NrCln/Fl9u6/3RB42lYyA5KLjUBCpKuC5jx rV8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=w+P36MRXK/bwgP3N30jaoLxb+o9c3AGeD/6tm4sv7Wo=; b=i0n9RIZqgG7nIQ71a/t9DgDjh0LUj/udmCgA6e3mIC+qr21K8vKl03ZFhZaywvAV/s 2BIzO8Uv7p2A7JopKWRgkTaYLgkn6HOgQ4Qo5+J5wQ6IVR48E3bsGLwePC2DsUlTgJKQ hmDsXbsDnYm+ImkCf0vxHfwctapgO+evXY3B5Hx61/gJ5X/N3CJe3yN+EKXeaHhrHGuv 10mbt9FGfVKda2EgDbGveOEovxb3pWk5szXhpCuZiyQAs7WPUFfla5jnHVrPNmcRaJRK E5HnbfAxgIh9FQtBOvV57ssC2PfTYzTplDTsYaexV1gXLLJCnGfzD7qIldv6WvJFpMvv HyLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x14si9046145ede.481.2021.09.13.23.15.43; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239698AbhINGPN (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:15:13 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:39272 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237875AbhINGPN (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:15:13 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10106"; a="244222301" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,292,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="244222301" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2021 23:13:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,292,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="699345992" Received: from louislifei-optiplex-7050.sh.intel.com (HELO louislifei-OptiPlex-7050) ([10.239.154.151]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2021 23:13:52 -0700 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:14:19 +0800 From: Li Fei1 To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yu1.wang@intel.com, shuox.liu@gmail.com, fei1.li@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] Introduce some interfaces for ACRN hypervisor HSM driver Message-ID: <20210914061419.GA16275@louislifei-OptiPlex-7050> References: <20210914060141.16187-1-fei1.li@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 08:07:01AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 02:01:39PM +0800, Fei Li wrote: > > Add some new interfaces for ACRN hypervisor HSM driver: > > - MMIO device passthrough > > - virtual device creating/destroying > > - platform information fetching from the hypervisor > > "RFC" means that you do not feel good about having these merged. What > needs to be finished before you send a "real" set of patches that you > want to have reviewed properly? Hi Greg Sorry, please ignore the "RFC". I feel good about these patches. Would you help to review these patches ? thanks. > > thanks, > > greg k-h